SC: Man gets 10 years for dragging dog behind truck

Seriously, I'm a member here and commenting on a story. Put me on ignore if you don't like my posts.

 

I live in a small town and I was at the 4 way on main street and a dude in a jack up four wheel drive comes through and I notice he is dragging a dog..I haul ass and cut him off and we get out of out vehicles bout the same time and he called me a dumbass..Lol next thing I know we were fist fighting on main street , broad daylight.Cops come and broke us apart and it was a lil red nose he was dragging..He had no idea and luckily she was just skinned up pretty good.Like what Treez said she had jumped off the back of the truck and he didn't see it happen so he was dragging her...People down here love to ride their dogs on the back of their trucks and I have saw this happen more than once..As crazy as this story sounds its true...Never intended on a fist fight was just trying to get the guy stopped.

 

I can understand an accident. The man in this article was drunk and has drinking problems.

 

I don't drink and drive , learned my lesson ..As bad as this is I don't think the guy should have got 10 yrs because this was an animal not a human..jmo....But if you look around , you will see people that has killed and molested innocent kids and get out of jail in less than 10 yrs..

 

People that molest innocent kids should get their dicks cut off, one swipe with an axe.

 

Well that's what I was saying if I saw that I would stop it,just like bamaman did. Did the drunk get to much time yes I think so but halve of that time was for being a habitual traffic offender.

 

poor pup, hope she gets the care she needs and makes a full recovery. As far the man, well... bad choices are made and accidents happen when you're inebriated. Do i think his sentence is steep? Definitely, however this man obviously needs some help and sadly sometimes jail is the safest place for them to be.

 

Now that I think about it this could have been a second or third offense DUI so who really knows. The dog lived BTW at least from what I remember.

 

Yep, here is another article:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/s-c-man-gets-10-5-years-in-dog-dragging-incident/

 

Just because animals are considered property does not give you the right to be cruel to them. Things aren't black or white and what ever you do, dont let people like animal rights activist define what is considered cruel and not. Dog fighting is not cruelty because proper fighting dogs fight by their own free will, thats why we need to chain them up properly or they will kill each other. Fighting a pit bull against a yorkie, that is cruel imo! Dog fighting is just like any other fighting sport, both parties are in on it. If not, cajun rules state that the cur dog that doesn't continue scratching will lose and the fight will no longer go on. This is not cruelty, this is fighting in its most just form.

Dragging a dog behind a car by accident is a terrible accident, just like any other accident. Doing it knowingly, is cruelty. What animal rights nuts think is cruel and not doesn't bother me. Their arguments have flaws, but i would never ever compare an animals, a living, breathing being, to lifeless property.

Seeing things that black and white only shows me a persons inability to think outside the box. I would never deal with a person that consider his dogs the same as lifeless property, eg. furniture!

 

"When you eat chicken egg's you are eating chicken babies" that's funny those egg's from factories are not fertilized. You don't need a rooster for a chicken to lay egg's.

 

Thats the best you could come up with??? LMAO!!!!!........regardless if the eggs are fertalized or not THEY ARE the chickens BABIES....same thing as veil.

 

Riiiight, ok moving on."In the space allowing judgement,the act disbars empathy,moral's and principal's" could not have said it better myself. Has nothing to do with being an "ANIMAL RIGHT'S ADVOCATE".