Sporting Dog Journal JULY 2010 OUT NOW!!!

SDJ JULY 2010 IS OUT NOW!!!

​

In this issue, we bring you an exclusive 2010 interview with legendary dogman, the living legend : Ozzie Stevens!!! You can also read about : GR CH CROATA, CH HOMER ROM, CH RASTUS, GR CH VIRGIL ROM, CH WILEY, VILI ROM. You will also find some excellent information on conditioning and breeding etc.

The PDF version of the Sporting Dog Journal will be published 12 times per year, and released around the 1 of each month. That’s right you read it correctly, this is not just another 6 issues per year magazine.

Our format is much the same as the “old” SDJ. There will be show news, stories, information, Champion, Grand Champion, and the ROM list etc.

As well unlike the old SDJ, we are not owned, or do we have a preference to and specific dogman, or bloodline. No longer will you have to receive a magazine that is solely dominated by the editors choice of associations, and bloodlines of their associates.

This is just a broad overview of what we will be offering in the Sporting Dog Journal.

Yearly subscription to the Sporting Dog Journal is $35 anywhere in the world.

Since we realize that many of the magazines that have come out as of late have not been serious in their commitment to the breed, and have folded in short order only to leave those with fully paid yearly subscriptions having to bite the bullet. With this in mind we are offering you the opportunity to try out our magazine without a yearly subscription.

Single issues of the Sporting Dog Journal will be available for the cost of $6 per issue for the first edition of the Sporting Dog Journal.

You can make a credit card payment online via paypal.

We highly recomend to specify the username for which payment is made. When making the payment paypal lets you add a note to the payment, use it to specify your username and any other message you want to convey to the administrators.

To make a secure credit card payment via paypal just click the button and fill out the info.

For one year subscription (12 issues), click the button below :



To buy the JULY 2010 issue, click the button below :



We are not looking for advertisers but if you want to advertise it’s OK with us.
Advertising rates are as follows : full page $10/issue, half page $5/issue.

Yours truly,
Johnny Corncob - int.sdj@gmail.com

JOIN SPORTING DOG JOURNAL ONLINE NOW!!!

 

i know from a good source that its being run by a wekk known person

 

First issue was a good one with real information for success with the dogs.
People will be happy the sdj is back and a little more careful about information.
I like the fact that they use the real ROM list. Good job fellas

 

its good to hear ppl like it i was shady at first but now im going to get it also.

 

well, with images in the publication, i do think given a situation where prosecutors are engaging, and given you own a dog with a scar, they can take the two and use them together basically saying with the pics in the publication indicate that it is in fact not fictional/historical, etc, rather that a defendant knew by the pics what they were looking at, and they could paint a pretty good pic saying someone is a dogfighter. but, im not a lawyer or cop, or a dogfighter, so if i am wrong go ahead and clarify please. Id hate to know some dog owner gets into a situation where they own dogs and someone happens across this scenario and it gets used against them.

 

I think most dogfight stings are probably about the technicalities like gambling and crossing state lines and such, not who owns a magazine. but if you compare it to someone shooting another in self defense but inside their house is a manual on one shot kill shots or how to snype etc, they would try to put that together and get em for premeditated murder, it would at least come up....

 

...very well put together. I loved the O.Steven's interview!

 

is it a mag or a pdf file?

 

For everyone's info. It is one hundred percent legal to sell images of Animal Cruelty in the U.S. It's covered under free speech. Whereas, I don't condone it, it is a man's right to sell educational videos; Google: April 20,2010 Supreme Court ruling Animal Cruelty. I copied and pasted an article below.

I would however caution participating in such activities put's a bullseye on the participants and if they want you they will get you somehow.

By Warren Richey, Staff writer / April 20, 2010 Washington Free speech advocates praised Tuesday’s US Supreme Court decision striking down a federal law banning depictions of animal cruelty.
Skip to next paragraph Related Stories

• Supreme Court rejects animal cruelty law, upholds free speech
• Supreme Court questions animal cruelty law
• Supreme Court to decide case on animal cruelty and free speech

<!-- /pod -->
<!-- /podBrder -->
<!-- /podStoryRel --> <!-- Anchor skipper link. Should be placed at the end of the Related Items pod and before the next paragraph --> At the same time, animal rights groups are calling on Congress to enact a new, more targeted law, to prevent trafficking in photos and videos depicting acts of severe animal cruelty, including so-called "crush" videos.
In striking down the 1999 Depiction of Animal Cruelty Act, Chief Justice John Roberts said the law was substantially overbroad and could criminalize depictions of entirely lawful conduct such as hunting videos and magazines. The vote was 8 to 1.
“It is clear from the opinion and the size of the majority that the court heard the many voices concerned about this law,” said David Horowitz, executive director of the Media Coalition, a free-speech advocacy group. “This law put at risk a broad range of newspaper articles, films, books, and images of hunting and wasn’t limited to dogfighting videos,” he said.
The 1999 law was aimed in part at outlawing the production and distribution of “crush videos” involving depictions of small animals being tortured and killed by women in high heel shoes. The videos were sold in an underground trade as part of a sexual fetish.
But the 1999 law also outlawed depictions of other acts of animal cruelty.
Free-speech advocates

The high court case stemmed from the arrest and conviction of a Virginia-based documentary producer named Robert Stevens who sold videos containing scenes of dogfights. Mr. Stevens said his videos were aimed at portraying the aggressive characteristics of pit bulls and the use of pit bulls in hunting. He argued that his documentaries were protected by the First Amendment.
A federal judge disagreed and a jury convicted him of selling banned depictions of dog fights in violation of the 1999 law. He was sentenced to three years in prison.
A federal appeals court overturned the conviction by declaring the underlying law unconstitutional. On Tuesday, the US Supreme Court also declared the law unconstitutional, but on different legal grounds.
In doing so, the high court rejected an attempt by the Obama administration to create a free speech balancing test that would weigh the value of the disputed speech against its societal costs to determine if it qualified for First Amendment protection.
“As a general principle, the First Amendment bars our government from dictating what Americans are allowed to see, read, speak, or hear,” said Gene Schaerr, a Washington lawyer who filed a friend of the court brief in the case on behalf of the Cato Institute. “Although one may debate the importance of public expression with regard to cruelty to animals … the government’s effort to remove any area of public expression from the First Amendment’s protection would have been highly troubling,” he said in a statement.
Mr. Horowitz agreed. “Giving the government freewheeling authority to judge the social worth of words and images is a dangerous proposition,” he said. “This landmark ruling affirms that First Amendment protections are not subject to balancing tests or limited to speech with so-called serious value.”
Animal-rights advocates

Officials at the Humane Society said they were disappointed by the decision striking down the law, but were hopeful Congress would pass new legislation.
“The Supreme Court’s decision gives us a clear pathway to enact a narrower ban on the sale of videos depicting malicious acts of cruelty, including animal crush videos and dogfighting,” said Wayne Pacelle, president of the Humane Society of the United States.
“Congress should act swiftly to make sure the First Amendment is not used as a shield for those committing barbaric acts of cruelty, and then peddling their videos on the Internet,” he said in a statement.
The group quoted from Justice Samuel Alito’s dissenting opinion. Justice Alito said the 1999 law was a “valuable statute that was enacted not to suppress speech, but to prevent horrific acts of animal cruelty – in particular the creation and commercial exploitation of crush videos, a form of depraved entertainment that has no social value.”
Alito said that the animals depicted in crush videos are “living creatures that experience excruciating pain.”
He said American society has long banned such cruelty.

 

it's a pdf file

 

thanks deniz.

 

:confused: Sporting Dog Journal July 2010 Out Now Man I'm Lost

 

I think it also considered probable cause for further investigation as it is considered "dog fighting paraphernalia". That means it could potentially get you caught up in an investigation or "recue" that you would have to spend thousands of dollars to get your dogs back even if you are found innocent, if they are even still alive at that point...:mad:

 

I would hope the organization/individual selling the vids didn't own dogs. That would be silly. However, i do agree it is cause for further investigation:

However, it's also my opinion that the paraphernalia charge wouldn't stick and if the DA/ADA had the balls to slap you with the charge; I would assume they thought you someone without access to counsel (Serious lawsuit or at least reprimand for a waste of grand jury's time).

Anyway as it is: I wouldn't sell the vids or materials

 

I think the cpos are behind this

 

I don't know if they are behind it... But it would be a hell of compiled list of suspected (%?!@#$?!)

Whatever they are prosecuting. Download IP address; Person of Interest.

Don't want to cause trouble... Just making an observation... I just hope the mags server is secure if it's not run by POPO

 

More money in donations and tax funding for ASPCA l*sers:

At least easier than trying to track the down the proceeds and get people to pay taxes on Dog activities and competitions.

I swear they need to be called out already.
Running out of things to prosecute. No more war on drugs/guns so now its the war on dogs...

The p*ssys need to grow some balls and start a small business instead of being punk ass hall monitors

 

There's no telling who runs this man but i think it's kind of random how they make a couple of threads then you don't see them on here nomore lol they want everyone to go check out there site I guess

 

Do what you want but having this,and having bulldogs in the same place is retarded.And if you send info to them...god help you.