Bruce Jenner

Um you got to remember that Jesus was written about in other religions Jesus is highly regarded in the Koran and I believe. He is mentioned. In it a few times .. I also believe the Torah May mention him also ... But it all comes down to if u believe or not And that's perfectly fine . Me I fall towards the idea that God exsists Jesus was created but the times I believe are all wrong I believe it was a lot longer back and I don't think Jesus is his real name Jesus is a roman name not arameic .. I also believe as human beings we exsisted on this earth a lot longer then historians admit .. We were probably around when Pangea was the only land mass but .. I only try to believe what historical and scientifical data can prove

 

So you're saying dinosaurs and people were living together? Lmao...there's a sucker born everyday lol

 

glen rose texas may prove they did .
human footprints alongside dinosaur footprints - Google Search

 

http://paleo.cc/paluxy.htm

 

Jesus wasn't his real given name.... It was Yashua


March isn't the only month for Madness!!

 

Translated to English that would be Joshua but somewhere along the times that was changed. As far as the herb is concerned I don't think anyone will be damned for taking part in it, it was put here for our use, it's viewed as a drug because it illegal so that opens a black market for it. If decriminalized and people could grow there own amount for personal consumption the criminal element wouldn't exist.


March isn't the only month for Madness!!

 

What are you talking about...only eating split hoof animals or when the demons entered into the swine and they ran to the dra and drown themselves....

 

Yes he is mentionef but as a prophet....JESUS is the only son of GOD. HE was not created he was with GOD in the begining..LEY US GO DOWN AND MAKE MAN IN OUR IMAGE

 

decriminalizing it won't do nothing but make things get bad . if you over their amount you can be i bad trouble . just google it i bet you will read it . full legalization will only stop the madness . they bring hard time for being over .

 

Hearsay means information derived from other people rather than on a witness' own knowledge.

Courts of law do not generally allow hearsay as testimony, and nor does honest modern scholarship. Hearsay does not provide good evidence, and therefore, we should dismiss it.

If you do not understand this, imagine yourself confronted with a charge for a crime which you know you did not commit. You feel confident that no one can prove guilt because you know that there exists no evidence whatsoever for the charge against you. Now imagine that you stand present in a court of law that allows hearsay as evidence. When the prosecution presents its case, everyone who takes the stand against you claims that you committed the crime, not as a witness themselves, but solely because they claim other people said so. None of these other people, mind you, ever show up in court, nor can anyone find them.

Hearsay does not work as evidence because we have no way of knowing whether the person lied, or simply based his or her information on wrongful belief or bias. We know from history about witchcraft trials and kangaroo courts that hearsay provides neither reliable nor fair statements of evidence. We know that mythology can arise out of no good information whatsoever. We live in a world where many people believe in demons, UFOs, ghosts, or monsters, and an innumerable number of fantasies believed as fact taken from nothing but belief and hearsay. It derives from these reasons why hearsay cannot serves as good evidence, and the same reasoning must go against the claims of a historical Jesus or any other historical person.

Authors of ancient history today, of course, can only write from indirect observation in a time far removed from their aim. But a valid historian's own writing gets cited with sources that trace to the subject themselves, or to eyewitnesses and artifacts. For example, a historian today who writes about the life of George Washington, of course, can not serve as an eyewitness, but he can provide citations to documents which give personal or eyewitness accounts. None of the historians about Jesus give reliable sources to eyewitnesses, therefore all we have remains as hearsay.

 

Lol.......i'll pray for you

 

I won't lol

 

I'm am not going to jump into this debate, but I just wanted to acknowledge the fact that your presentation was very well written. .:cool:

 

Well by decriminalized I meant legal, as in not a crime to grow or to have


It's a hard life, but I'm living.

 

Deuteronomy 14, have you not read his word? And I don't mean bouncing around picking and choosing scriptures and chapters, I mean you need to read from start to finish.


It's a hard life, but I'm living.

 

What do the ancient hebrew manuscripts say....

 

Tell me word for word what it says

 

Good read and i apreciate you quoting that to me

 

cajun you know very few will read the whole bible and reread it to understand it . they liked to be told what it says in there .

 

Bruce hates all of you!!!!!!!!!