New Proposals To Amend The DDA

Page last updated at 13:28 GMT, Tuesday, 9 March 2010

All dogs could be insured under dangerous breeds plans

All dog owners in England and Wales would have to insure against their pet attacking someone under Labour proposals to tackle dangerous breeds.

Police and local authorities could also be given powers to force owners of dangerous dogs to muzzle them or even get them neutered.

Ministers say the consultation responds to concerns about the use of animals to intimidate or threaten people.

But the Tories say Labour has allowed the problem to grow in recent years.

Each week, more than 100 people are admitted to hospital after dog attacks.

There has also been a reported rise in levels of dog fighting and illegal ownership, particularly by gangs who are using dangerous dogs as status symbols.

Complicated

Coming a few weeks before a general election is expected, the government has launched a consultation on amending the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act.

This legislation banned ownership of four types: the pit bull terrier, the Japanese tosa, the dogo Argentino and the fila Brasileiro.

It also gave police powers to deal with any dogs, of whatever breed, that became out of control in a public place - with destruction of the animal the ultimate sanction.

But if a dog not on the banned list of types causes an injury on private property - such as someone's home - it is not covered by the Dangerous Dogs Act.

Instead, owners have to be pursued under the Dogs Act of 1871, which is seen as more time-consuming and complicated.

The government's consultation suggests extending the 1991 legislation to private property.

Ministers argue this will also protect postal workers, telecoms engineers and other people whose work takes them on to private land.

Another proposal is to introduce compulsory third-party insurance for dog owners to ensure attack victims are compensated.

'Public safety'

Home Secretary Alan Johnson said he was concerned that some owners were keeping dogs with the sole purpose of intimidating other people.

He told BBC News: "What most dog owners recognise is that what's going on is cruelty to animals.

"Other dogs are being treated abysmally because of this fashion for 'status dogs', which has been the main issue over the last five or six years."

Environment Secretary Hilary Benn said: "There is a lot of public concern about dog attacks, including the recent tragic deaths of young children, and about the rise in the number of so-called status dogs used to intimidate or threaten people.

"This is a serious issue of public safety. The government wants to hear what people think about the law as it stands and what more we might do to protect people from dangerous dogs."

The CWU postal union welcomed the proposals as "long overdue", with general secretary Billy Hayes saying: "Thousands of our members are attacked at work every year. This reform cannot come soon enough."

The RSPCA said a serious debate on the issue was needed, concentrating on curbing irresponsible pet ownership.

The charity's government relations manager, Claire Robinson, said: "There is a real need for updated legislation that enables enforcers to tackle the problem effectively and prevent serious incidents from occurring rather than waiting till after a tragedy or penalising certain dogs just because of their breed or type."

The Conservatives said the government had allowed the problem to get worse, with the number of people convicted for allowing their dogs to cause injury more than doubling in the past decade.

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said penalties for dangerous dog offences had to be "sensible" and that any changes to the law had to be "simple and strong".

Peter Tallack, a former Metropolitan Police dog handler, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that owners of dangerous dogs had "a lack of understanding of what potential they've got on their hands".

"It's become a major problem now. It's become a bit of a cult.

"It's very difficult for the police. With all the resources in the world we couldn't tackle the problem at the moment."

He added: "I don't think there's a choice other than dog registration over the next few years."

The proposed insurance plan would not apply in Scotland. However, a backbench bill proposed by the SNP's Christine Grahame is currently being examined by the Scottish Parliament.

The Control of Dogs Bill would allow councils to impose restrictions on owners who failed to control their pets.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8556195.stm

 

still a pile of shit.....

 

I could'nt agree more but they could rush some silly ass law through like they did with the DDA back in 91.

 

I just saw on the news that they are 'considering' that the new proposals could possibly be aimed at all breeds, not just the 'dangerous ones'. This would be great but personally cant see that happening. Heres hoping!!

 

the rest is bullshit i would just like to say...