thanks to a true dogman

Naus, good job bro, but, that one there is a lost cause.

 

NAUS FRENCHY POSTED THE PED AND SAID HE WAS GETTING THAT DOG ALSO, SO HE MUST HAVE MEANT THAT DOG, BUT EITHER WAY MY INTEREST IS TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE DOG AND IF THAT PED IS CORRECT , AS HE HAS DOGS FROM 1972 IN HIS SECOND GENERATION AND EVEN THOUGH ITS POSSIBLE , IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW WHEN HANK DIED FOR EXAMPLE TO WORK OUT THE TIMELINE FOR THIS DOG.


http://www.apbt.online-pedigrees.com/modules.php?name=Public&file=printPedigree&dog_id=290154

 

The previous dog using that particular ID# 290154 in the peds archive was a Boze Eli bred dog, The NEW ped entered in 2011 has nothing to do with the original post which was created in 2008. The ped ID# 290154 has been recycled and now has a new pedigree entered under that ID#.

On a different note gar, do you have contact info for the people who purchased the white dogs from you who live in Norway? I have lost contact with them and would love to talk with them again, if you could help me out I would much appreciate it.

All the best, NGK.

 

NGK THE PED MIGHT BE RECYCLED ETC , BUT DAVES BLK POISONS PED SHOWS HANK (BORN IN 1972) IN HIS SECOND GENERATION , AND IF IN 2008 FRENCHIE WAS LOOKING TO AQUIRE THAT DOG AS HE POSTED THE PED SO HE MUST HAVE MEANT DAVES BLK POISON , AND EVENTHOUGH IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE IF HANK A VERY OLD DOG WHEN HE SIRED BLK POISONS DAM, WHO INTURN WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE BEEN PRETTY OLD HERSELF WHEN SHE WHELPED HIM, JUST HOPING SOMEONE KNEW HOW OLD HANK WAS WHEN HE DIED , AS I NEVER SEEN A MODERN DOG WHO IS LESS THAN 10 YEARS OLD (WITH HANK IN THE SECOND GEN FROM A DOG WHELPED CIRCA1998/2000)AS I ASSUME BLK POISON SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN 2008 FOR FRENCHIE TO HAVE WANTED TO USE HIM FOR BREEDING .As for the guys in norway THEY DIDNT BUYB THE WHITE DOG FROM ME I NOW HAVE MOST OF THAT BLOOD , PM IF YOU WANT TO KNOW ABOUT HTE NORWAY GUY OR WERE YOU LOOKING FOR SOME BLOODSTOCK .

 

Look at ped 354711 or click offspring and follow the lineage down to modern day and you will see what I am trying to tell you. Frenchie did not want to use that dog for breeding, this is just a misunderstanding, The ped in question is not a modern ped it is a newly entered old pedigree.

I'll pm you about Norway.

NGK

 

You gotta remember your talking to gar he will just keep typing you won't win!

 

robbie at least i try to write my feelings and give my explanations to things.you are like most with no knowlegde you just write oneline with nothing of value most likely just like the dogs you breed.if you take the time to look at the original post from 2008 by frenchjie who posted the ped of daves blk poison , it was obvious to me having seen hank in his second generation who was born in 1972 , that it was very unlikely that daves blk poison could be still alive and not an old dog even with generous whelping times.now people are saying that peds online reuse peds and thats whtas happened here , but i didnt know that so i went by the facts posted ,and i still think its strange , as i would have thought that once o ped is registered thats it that ped/dog has that ped number etc , as ohterwise it gets complicated and situation like this one come up .

 

Gar you think you know it all but i don't even breed any dogs and you like to talk out your ass like you know something just cause someone puts a ped online you want to come on here and talk shit that it aint true well he is some news for you most peds online are fake or made up by bored internet dogmen just to get you all excited you been told a number of times they REUSE PED NUMBERS but you still want to continue just like when you talk about mayfeild and the purest of the pure dogs you say you have the best to look thru a collar

 

wow you heard it folks he dont even own or breed any dogs , and he is upset that i from owning and breeding dogs have an opinion , well guess what robbie thats called freedom of speech , somehting i thought the good ol usa was proud about , or are you a communist ?.now i may fight my corner on the mayfield dogs we have had and still have ,and i do believe they are the best genectic source for al other families , and the reason i say thay is from years of expierience and if you want to get angry and say i think i know it all thats your problem, i just put my opinion in from years of knowl;edge ,and if that pisses you off robbie and any ohter person on here who just doesnt bother investing time into improving thier understanding ,then thats your loss not mine.as for the reused peds , if thats the case ok no problem ,but its a shit system , and if you hadnt know about the resued peds robbie , wouldnt you have looked at daves blk poisen who was supposed to have been no more than 6/7 years old in 2008, and seen hank in his second generation born in 1972 and though that dont seem right to me ?i think you would and i did also, and if you and men like you dont give a shit about the true breeding of our dogs , its no wonder and a damn good job you dont have or breed these dogs , as they would be in a shitty state if you did and thats why we have so many untrue bred families today , and whether you like or respect me or not robbie , i dont play that shitty game and my dogs are bred truer than anyone i know from way back without the big ? Over their peds and i will continue that untill the end

 

robbie you find me the post were i state that my mayfield dogs are the best to look through a collar ? Bet you wont find that statement .folks the lesson in understanding is about to begin , and it wont last long as some people dont have an ounce understanding of their own , bring it on robbie lets see how long this last without you having ot use oneliners with no knowledge to fight you corner , hell your first post shows it.

 

thread closed.