Going Light Barney and Blue Dogs by Richard F. Stratton

Going Light Barney and Blue Dogs by Richard F. Stratton

Although I have been often referenced as the authority on Going Light Barney, I must confess that I never even saw Barney in holds. I found it quite fascinating, however, that he was one of the most controversial dogs of which I ever knew. I think part of the reason for that fact was Barney’s flamboyant owner, who is still alive as I write this. Although not a bad fellow, he had a way of stirring up the dander of other dog men. Consequently, all of Barney’s accomplishments were always scrutinized with a jaundiced eye. Since I had my picture taken with Barney, a lot of people seem to think that Barney once belonged to me, but such was not the case, although I did own a daughter of his which I bred back to him. That breeding produced George, one of my finest all-time dogs from a pit dog perspective.

It is hard to believe now, but Barney was whelped way back in the sixties, so he is definitely an old timer. He was the product of breeding a daughter of Johnston’s fabulous Goofy dog to a Rascal bitch. That produced Barney’s mother, Penny, and she was nothing to write home about–possibly a cold bitch and a trifle shy. She was bred to Rootberg’s Booger, strictly on the basis of his being a pure Corvino dog. So it is not surprising that not much was expected of the litter, but it produced Barney and several females which were renowned for their gameness, one of them, Going Light Babe, winning a Best in Show down South in a losing effort!

Barney had a storied career. He had been farmed out to some guy in the inner city to raise and was rolled from the time he was six months old, something no educated dog man would do. After he killed Two-Dollar George, a highly valued pit dog in a pick up match when he was only a little over a year old, he was reclaimed by his owner, who called himself Larry Light in the pit circuit. He was matched into fast company down in Mississippi against a Carver dog and won handily in about twenty minutes. This was the convention which also featured Boomerang and the immortal Bolio. Bolio won best in show because he won over the dog with the highest reputation, a dog which was thought to be unbeatable.

The controversy comes from the fact that Barney was counted out in his third match in Dallas. Larry swore up and down that he was doped, as the dog didn’t know where he was, and he had lost his equilibrium for several hours. Whatever happened, Barney came back to win six in row against the best the other side could come up with. One match was raided and the dogs confiscated. This was before the felony laws, and the dogs were broken out of the pound in which they were held. The match was held, and Barney won in an hour and five minutes. Barney was dyed black and shipped to a preacher in New Mexico. Part of the reason for all of this chicanery was that Larry was suing the animal control people for losing possession of his dog!

Barney’s toughest match was against another ear dog, extremely well thought of, and the match went nearly two hours before Barney prevailed. That was back in the oil crisis days, in which you couldn’t plan a long trip, as you might run out of fuel. Larry and his cohorts loaded up a station wagon with several gallons of gasoline so that they could make the trip there and back without having to stop or having to worry about fuel. I was invited to go along, but I was not of a mind to travel in that rolling bomb! Hence, I missed my chance to see a great match. Barney usually had an easy time with his opponents, controlling them with ear holds until the dog was worn down, and then Barney went in for the kill. I think it was the "quit" in Dallas that made it possible for Larry to go on finding matches for Barney.

After the above mentioned match, a fellow named Jobe, who put out a pit dog magazine, did a cover story on Barney. He had been there at the match, and he dubbed Barney a "grand champion." That was the first time I had ever seen that term used. Now, he would not be eligible for the title because of the loss in his second match. Mitigating circumstances don’t count, and besides, Larry was never able to prove anything.

Barney was known more for ability than for gameness, but he was game enough to win, and the loss came under suspicious circumstances. Barney was an unusual Bulldog in that he had an aloof personality, in direct contradistinction to most Bulldogs. He won Larry’s wife over because he would sit up and do tricks on the chain or in the kennel run, but once he was taken out, his demeanor changed completely. He had achieved his goal, so the charm was gone, and he simply was off to do what he wanted. Larry, who was a real estate speculator who owned half the land in San Diego county, loved the deviousness of the dog. He was also delighted that his wife, who abhorred the pit dog game, was Barney’s stoutest ally–although she certainly never went to a match.

Barney was never open to stud, and he was never bred much, as Larry seemed to concentrate his breeding program on breeding dogs that were down from Penny and in breeding Barney’s sisters, in particular Babe. Larry was one of those guys who kept track of litters by naming all the pups with the same letter, but somehow one in this litter got named Scarlet. Although a fine pit dog, she escaped Larry’s ownership. Another game sister of Barney was Belle, who won several matches.

As for blue dogs, most of them are sought out today by those who want a dog for appearance. I have even heard it said that all blue dogs stem from Staf blood. Being of a skeptical nature, I tend to doubt that "fact." One of the best dogs I ever saw was a blue dog and his brother in a Las Vegas convention. They were both talented and game, but I was never able to ascertain their breeding–but they certainly seemed to have no Staf blood in them. Besides, the Staf standard calls for a black nose, so I doubt that would be the source of the blue dogs. In truth, there are probably a multitude of sources, as it seems to be a simple Mendelian trait.

Readers may be amused to learn that Heinzl once informed me that the last Stratton he knew was an African-American gentleman who had a strain of blue dogs. Again, he didn’t know the breeding on them, but Howard said they were as game a line as he had ever seen. And Howard was tough to please!

People with a little experience are quick to denounce Barney and the blue dogs. I would suggest a little caution in that respect. Barney may have not been the greatest dog of his time, but he beat some really good dogs. And not all blue dogs are alike.

CH GOING LIGHT BARNEY (8XW)(1XL)

http://www.apbt.online-pedigrees.com/public/printPedigree.php?dog_id=14057

Found on: http://www.riospitbull.com/​

 

Again, get the facts. Barney was NOT a blue dog. He was a brindle with some white markings. I've got the photos to prove. it.

What's up with trying to justify all these dogs that we KNOW are not APBTs? Is it personal?

 

I dont even know who wrote them, just thought they were interesting and wanted to see what people think, incase you were refering to me or thought i was the author.

 

I just realized the three threads on blue dogs in context of each other lol...I hope these posts were just made for general reference, but I am afriad that's not the case. Anyway, here's a picture of Barney as Mia stated...




This article has caused some confusion, and those that don't know better have mistaken Barney for a blue dog...this simply is not the case nor can this article be used to support American Bullys because as Mr. Stratton stated,

"As for blue dogs, most of them are sought out today by those who want a dog for appearance."

Is there anything wrong with a blue dog? No not at all, but this article can not be used to condone the idea of breeding for color, or any one triat. Breed for the whole package...if the dog is blue or black and tan it doesn't matter one bit from a historical perspective. A bulldog is a bulldog and the measure is function first.

I just wanted to clarify that Going Light barney was not one. There are alot of people out there that get this wrong, and I just wanted to set the record straight, and in context of the other three articles...

 

To anyone that has read any of the stratton books could see that barney is in several colored pages and shows that he is a white and brindle dog I don't know why people would confuse it with being blue or maybe its just how the author wrote it who knows

 

going light barney is NOT a blue dog, this article just talks about his story AND blue dogs, so yeah i can see how some dumb shits might get confused if they dont actually read.

and for the record rio pitbulls has a block so you cant save text or anything so i got passed that and just copied the articles and put them on here. just happened thats what i was reading that day, so no secret agenda or anything.

by the way, that is a really good picture of barney, i havent seen that one before, he is in my females 7th generation.

 

mind posting a ped for your dog?

Barney was not bred that much (when compared to other dogs with as many wins) because he quit in a match. He did come back, and win later...but he quit that one day and that tarnished his reputation. Again the claims were made that a rub was used, but being counted out hurt his production record even though he won 6 straight matches after his loss... and that is why Im intereseted in seeing peds with him in there.

 

Good ear dogs were real hard to beat.....

 

http://http://www.geocities.com/coldsteelcqc/Burlesons.White.Angel_7GenPed.htm

 

Link doesnt work....

 

I think ppl get the idea that GLB was blue b/c the 2 articles run together. Perhaps if they were split up on a different page we wouldn't have had as much confusion.

 

Richard Stratton is the author who is probably as much an expert on the breed as anyone you could ever meet, he has written several books on the gamebred APBT, to anyone who hasn't read "The World of the American Pit Bull Terrier" I highly recommend it. It has some great historic accounts, and on page 55 is the pic he speaks of, himself with the great Going Light Barney, so I assure you he is well aware the dog is not blue! He never said he was, The article is really of two different subjects with the moral being "People with a little experience are quick to denounce Barney and the blue dogs. I would suggest a little caution in that respect. Barney may have not been the greatest dog of his time, but he beat some really good dogs. And not all blue dogs are alike."

 

his pedigree posted at the bottom of the article is wrong