Where on Earth...

are you from?​

​

Game-Dog members represent your continents! ​

 

Just waiting for that one guy who picks Antarctica...

 

there ye go.....ye can wait no more ....lol...

 

I know this poll is anonymous but whoever you are we gotta see picture of you next to a glacier!!! LOL.

 

glacier??.......what glacier??......dont you know about global warming??....im sat in the south pole in my thongs playing beach volleyball and dodging the hungry polar bears.....

 

I wanna see that picture!!!!!! :eek: I think we all do!!! LOL

 

North America!

 

hungry polar bears huh? better hide the bulldogs

 

these are skinny malnourished shocking specimins of polar bear tho..the bulldogs would have them no problem...lol...as there aint no food for the polar bears because of the americans big massive cars ruining the earth and devestating thier habitat through over polution of thier automobiles needless massive engines so they can drive down to 7/11 in thier big fecking humvee to buy a few bud light:p:p.........meeeeeeeeeoooooow.....i can be quite a bitch when i get a few tins in me.....scratch your eyes out......lmfao....

 

Can you send me some Polar bear hide. This cow stuff we use up north, just aint cutting it...

 

Asia, Africa and South America...Where you at!?!

 

sorry pal....i cant....that polar bear meat is just too damn good for the dogs and me....and the pelts make a fine blanket to get jiggy under.....lol...:p

 

lmao! so i take it that you didnt read the statistics or you know you are out numbered... either that or you feel safe bc ur in a million miles away protectrf by malnourished polar bears:rolleyes:

 

By Alan Caruba

I received an email from the Sierra Club urging me to sign a petition to declare the polar bear an endangered species.

The Department of the Interior is considering this and it would cover much of the Arctic, including the sea ice of the Arctic Ocean. The Sierra Club is worried because Shell Oil wants to drill for oil in the Beaufort Sea, a part of the “critical habitat for the bear.”

So, for anyone who doesn’t think that thwarting all attempts to drill for oil in the Arctic isn’t the real reason to “save” the thriving polar bear population, the answer is that it has nothing to do with polar bears and everything to do with the primary goal of all environmental organization, denying energy sources to Americans and everyone else.

Indeed, the Sierra Club said declaring the polar bear endangered was “necessary to stop harmful activities such as oil drilling.” So I guess it doesn’t get any more plain than that.

The Sierra Club went on to blatantly lie about the status of polar bears, claiming that “survival rates for polar bear cubs are plunging.” It is common knowledge that male polar bears are known to kill cubs, but the survival rates have much more to do with the mother bear’s ability to catch ringed seals.

Ironically, polar bears’ favorite delicacy is the pups of ringed seals. Mother Nature doesn’t much care who wins the survival marathon and the Sierra Club is not calling for an endangered species declaration for ringed seals.

The Sierra Club is lying. The Natural Resources Defense Council is lying. The World Wildlife Fund is lying. They could not care less about polar bears. Their objective is shutting off access to anywhere that has oil or natural gas reserves.

In a July 2006 a report, “Polar Bear Politics: Underestimating the survival capacity of one popular bear” by Jennifer Marohasy, the Director of the Food and Environmental Unit at the Australian based Institute of Public Affairs was published. The estimate of the population is “about 25,000 polar bears existing in 19 relatively discrete populations across Norway, Denmark, Russia, Alaska, Greenland, and Canada.”

“Forty years ago, there were only about 5,000 bears, the worldwide population depressed by hunting.” In the 1970s, nations agreed to restrict hunting, resulting in the growth of the population.

The BIG LIE is that the Arctic is melting because of “global warming.” The Arctic has, in fact, “warmed” over the past two decades and there has been a reduction in sea ice, but there has been no “global warming”, only a natural cycle of warming that followed a Little Ice Age that ended around 1850 after three hundred years.

In fact, in October 2007, NASA announced the results of an in-depth study of Arctic sea ice and concluded what melting had occurred was due “a change in wind patterns” that had “compressed the sea ice, loaded it into the Transpolar Drift Stream, and then sped its flow out of the Arctic.” Wind patterns, not “global warming.”

The Earth is now into a new cooling cycle that began in 1998 and which meteorologists predict will last for several decades. What they won’t tell you is that they have their fingers crossed that it does not, in fact, signal a new Ice Age. The period between ice ages is about 11,500 years and the Earth is at the end of the interglacial period that has allowed for the rise of human civilization in the past five thousand years or so.

So, the fate of the polar bear is such that they are more likely to survive a new Ice Age than billions of humans in the northern hemisphere.

As should be obvious to everyone, the reduction of Arctic sea ice or the population of ringed seals has had no correlation whatever with the growth of the polar bear population. Indeed, if there hadn’t been a period of glaciation about 250,000 years ago and a bunch of formerly brown bears had not become isolated and had not adapted successfully, there would be no polar bears.

Further putting the lie to the Sierra Club and other environmental organization’s predictions is the fact that polar bears live in remote and inhospitable parts of the Arctic. In addition, they are not stationary, roaming over an area as large as two hundred square kilometers in search of tasty seals. Most of the time, humans can’t even visit or fly over the vast bulk of the Arctic to make any kind of count.

The Sierra Club has no idea how many polar bears actually exist in the Arctic and any claim that they are “endangered” is pure balderdash. I could use another word to describe such claims, but my Mother told me not to.

So, to sum up, the Sierra Club is LYING about polar bears and you would be well advised to take anything else they have to say with a grain of Arctic Sea salt.

 

No polar bears in antartica mate.
kiwi here

 

:rolleyes: always one to spoil the fun aint there.....moof "attenbrough":p:p

 

My inlaws have been traveling up into the arctic circle just about every spring for generations. I've gone up a few times myself. As someone who has been and seen, I can tell you that Alan Caruba is wrong. My inlaws can pull out pics of them racing the snowmobiles in places years ago that are now open water. Caruba is right about one thing though, in the end this has little to do with saving polar bears, and everything to do with saving Homo Sapiens Sapiens. I'm sure that when most of the place become uninhabitable Shell, Exxon and the rest will be happy to build huge plastic UV protected biodome bubbles for the survivors who can afford the rent. So, my advice is that if you're going to keep spreading crap from those denying reality for profit, make sure you set up that biodome savings plan for your descendents just like Shell and Exxon execs can with their multi million dollar bonuses. And by the way, those elusive polar bears are getting easier to find. With the ice going they're moving closer to where the people are.

 

I just got home from the Arctic on Monday and rest assured there is no shortage of bears around.

 

Hell, they're easier to find all the time.

 

Thats because theres no snow to camo them with......easier to see and they coming closer to home for the food...