1. Welcome to Game Dog Forum

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

Old School vs New School

Discussion in 'Dog Discussion' started by ohav4, Jan 30, 2020.

  1. stickler

    stickler Banned

    Old school to me means tight bred family dogs with a style and character you can bet on.
    Also the way they go after a cross has been made. A cross has to be made for the right reason.
    Old school breeders don't wanna get 'new dogs' with each 'new cross'. They just want something that adds something good to their own family of dogs.
    If the cross 'clicked well' for the breeder, than he will always breed back to his 'original' family. He does not want to change his whole family.
    Reason could be just some hybrid vigor for another 2-4 generations to work with.

    New school is just another/the other way after a cross has been made. Each generation bred by another guy, probably for different reasons.
    If you 'need' to cross your dogs, than maybe it's time to think about the quality of your own dogs and if this is what you really want.
    To me it's about percentages. I like a good game family of dogs to start with. I feel this is giving better odds than 'the exception of the rule dog'.
    I even consider the man behind the dogs more than the dogs on their own. I don't wanna talk to 16 different people to get some background of my dogs.
    With old school you know what you get to some degree, with new school it's even more of a gamble. Scatter bred ? 4-way-cross ? Best to best ?

    New school may produce the top dog, but percentage wise I would bet on the old school bred dogs. Sounds to me like the safer bet.
     
    Gilberto S and 80BOWTIE like this.
  2. slim12

    slim12 Super Moderator Staff Member

    I will see the point here, but will disagree.

    There is no such thing as old school and new school. The only difference is the people involved change over time. Basket ball is the same. 5 on 5. One rim at each end of the court. The rim is 10' from the ground. Football is still blocking and tackling and holding onto the ball. Just like the dogs, the people playing basketball have changed. Bigger, faster and stronger.

    The dogs no different in that sense, but should be much better than they are, or ever were. The advances in science and nutrition and supplementation suggests the dogs should be super freak athletes compared to their ancestors. But they are not.

    The dog you listed as new school is pretty much bred straight out of the 70's and 80's. If I were buying into 'old school-new school' I would say that dog was old school with new school owners.

    The dog you listed as 'old school' looks that way because the same name McCool covers the entire pedigree posted.

    If I posted a straight Mims dog it would look 'old school' too.

    If I cross it up and add some color to the pedigree, the blues and reds that give it flash, add it six different owners and six more kennel names, it looks 'new school'.

    End of the day, the today dogs have a direct link to yesterday dogs. The people portion of the pedigree in today's dogs jump all over the place.

    S



     
    Tiznow, Revelator, Gilberto S and 2 others like this.
  3. my two cents every ten years the so called new school arrives and when I tell em hey man we imported that same stuff ten years ago it didnt work they call u a hater
    than it doesnt work again but than they one to the new

    work em they will work , preserve a bloodline that has been preserved for generations hell thats what u will get
    in a way its simple u know

    many years probably 30 I was talking to a guy called captain he was convinced of a many things one of the things he was convinced off is that if the mother was worked it would show in the pups
    today's studies show that experience , food , well being changes your dna
    thats why I am surprised at the remarks of some that say a good dog no matter what will be a good dog


    nah educate , read , just like a shy mother u take them pups away early these dogs do change dna due to environment , food , all of it
    see it like this if mike tyson was born white , with wealthy parents , loads of that takeaway food on his table
    u think he would be that angry , poor , black mofo that wanted to kill everyone ?
     
    ohav4 likes this.
  4. slim12

    slim12 Super Moderator Staff Member

    Enviroment plays a role.

    I think everything plays a role. I think everything, both big and small, plays a factor from the time a guy says, "I'm going to breed these two dogs" all the way to a guy says "Back dog the winner". Any and everything between.

    A man, new or old, can make or break a dog. Easy-peasy. Make or break.

    I think great conditioning and great handling can hide the cur. And I think if one goes looking for the cur he will find it, regardless of the dog, it is in there.

    The man continues the change at a far greater pace than the dog.

    S
     
    Revelator likes this.
  5. ohav4

    ohav4 Big Dog

    Good point. The only difference between the mainstream sports and underground sport is in mainstream sports the athletes have improved because children are being groomed much earlier then before and there are a lot more professional style leagues under the mask of “amateur” that are getting athletes prepared much quicker. Also the rules in a lot of professional sports has changed to be geared more towards OFFENSIVE. Underground sport tho the rules have not changed the mindset of OFFENSE has taken the front seat in a lot of working programs that I have seen. That’s the difference to me because tbh I could post actual examples of old school and new school shit but I ain’t gonna put people who are really running in front street. But a lot of older style programs really ain’t winning consistently in the “Fast Lane” right now and that’s a fact. I’m sure we all know all stock ain’t “working” stock. A lot of these mainstream crosses and bloods are not “working stock” anymore. Not by themselves at least. But that’s just my 2cents. If you ever listened to them old timers interviews and stuff they didn’t consider a lot of them “Jeep redboy” “Boyle’s” and different crosses as the same thing as what they were doing. Of course that was all in the 70’s 80’s and 90’s. Here we are in 2020 and a lot of the shit that is REALLY “Fast Lane” ain’t off of those stand alone families and crosses anymore as much ‍♂️. Plus it’s plenty new big names and producers i feel deserve their shine and respect too. But for some reason everyone is stuck in the 80’s and 90’s. Yes all dogs started from a few bloodlines but ain’t nobody calling a Redboy dog a “Colby” hound. Ijs
     
  6. ohav4

    ohav4 Big Dog

    Great point. See and from what I have seen a lot of new programs are looking at their animals much younger than before. My old head also told me that a crazy mother with produce crazy pups. I’ve seen that too be true. The old “Nurture vs Nature” debate. From my experience a lot of new camps are starting their young ones earlier and making crosses as they please. That in my opinion is what has changed when I say old school vs new school. Because tho all of these dogs do come from a common starting point these last 10 years from what I have been seeing the style of “Nurturing” aka “Wait until they are 24 months” is long out the window. If they ain’t started up in half that time a lot of people won’t even add it into their programs.
     
  7. F.W.K.

    F.W.K. CH Dog

    Old School Standards - Modern Dogs.
    Without history no future.
     
  8. slim12

    slim12 Super Moderator Staff Member

    Agree to a point.

    I see a lot of dogs 'being started' earlier because the new generation pretty much lacks patience. But ask your 'old head' about his experience with dogs being started early. I think the most accurate way to predict the future is to look at the past. The history/past of these dogs say when you start them early, they hang it up early.

    I also agree the change in sports and the change in mindsets. Only a handful of years ago Curry does not get the same chance or opportunity he got. I believe there have been a number of Curry-s in the past but they were not believed to be big enough to play in the league. Same with the slot receivers in football. Not too long ago these 5-11 speedsters were good college players but not given the chance to play on Sunday. It is the people and the mindset.

    The dogs are pretty much similar. Regardless of old or new, they simply have to make their scratch, regardless.

    What I have seen in the last 5-7 years is the over all percentages of winning, or game dogs per litter, per kennel, per breeder is going down. The biggest reason is the dogs are being mass produced. The number of working kennels is on a steady decline while people selling puppies off someone else's name is on a steady incline. Thus percentages fall.

    When the Jeep dogs were at the forefront, basically when Jeep was alive or the first few years after he was gone people were talking about dogs from 20 years before that. Pick the dog at that 20 year mark and someone will talk about 20 years before that. The kicker is that since way back then the number of dogs have went up and the percentage of those dogs being done have went down.

    The clicks of today are doing nothing any different than the clicks of yesterday. The nod they get from me is that times are different. It is not like I am a hundred years old and talking about another century but it my lifetime I have seen the time where doing dogs was a non-chalant affair. No one cared, or better said no one bothered to care. The guy doing dogs today has so much more to worry about than just 10-15-20 years ago.

    The people have changed. The times have changed. The dogs, not so much.

    Again, it was no more important for Red Boy to make his scratch than it was for Grip/Titiere to make theirs, or vice versa. (or the dog that is being tuned in for this Saturday night for that matter)

    King James brings a lot to the table and may be the most incredible physical specimen to ever play the game but Kareem and the sky hook would take his lunch money every day of the week, maybe twice on Sundays.

    S
     
  9. ohav4

    ohav4 Big Dog

    Exactly we are on the same page 100%. Now don’t get me wrong I was educated to wait until 24 months to hit the woods hard because their minds, teeth, bones and skin are much more mature and sturdy at that point. But at the same time the world is moving so fast nobody wants to sit on a cold 32 month old that might not work out. But there are still plenty real ones breeding true and keeping percentages high but most of them ain’t on the internet at all. So I just say if you want the real deal don’t except to get it on FB or Hoobly. At least not at a high percentage. The cream always rises to the top. And once the bulldog fad goes away most of this watered down shit will be forgotten too.
     
    Gilberto S, david63 and slim12 like this.
  10. oldguy

    oldguy CH Dog

    @slim12 I believed for a while too many of us overlook the intelligence, psychology and spirit of our dogs.. All emphasis on pedigrees, nutrition, condition, supplements, hardware etc, we forget there's no point presenting a sculpted, vein popping athlete if your dog is stressed and unmotivated.. I sometimes wondered why UK import dogs (from decent kennels) in the 80's/90's stopped and forever labelled curs? Obviously some of them maybe were, but most I knew were only out of quarantine a month, then dragged straight out to hunt something,

    It wasn't until I saw the neglect my own import gyp suffered over 6 months inside a quarantine facility I realised the poor little bastard was scared, depressed, malnourished, suffering separation anxiety and other psychological problems consistent with being dragged from her kennel, locked in a sky crate, loaded onto a airplane, flown across the ocean, then tossed in a concrete pen for the next 6 months.. Men have broke down, went insane and committed suicide under similar circumstances in jail and they wasn't being asked to fight competition MMA within a month of their release!

    I remember Norman Hoooten (RIP) wrote an open letter in UK Pit Bull News, someone sold a gyp called Hooten's Jailhouse to one of the English camps, He wanted Jailhouse back, said he loved her, the person who sent her to England never had any right selling her and he was willing to compensate the new owners if they'd return her.. I was impressed by Hooten's genuine concern over Jailhouse.. Later I heard a story from a respected UK dogman who told me Jailhouse was stopped soon after she left quarantine.. I remember asking why would someone like Norman Hooten be worried over a cur like that? He could own any dog from the best working kennels in Texas? Why worry over a cur like Jailhouse? Common sense told me she was no cur! I think she was probably everything Hooten would have desired and expected, then she got transported to UK, suffered from depression and asked to compete when she couldn't! My opinion!
     
    Gilberto S, stickler, F.W.K. and 3 others like this.
  11. slim12

    slim12 Super Moderator Staff Member

    I was there once too. Now that I am a tad older I have seen the error in my ways.
    No doubts this generation does not want to wait, but that was the same way back then, believe it or not. Back then the guy was considered hard on his dogs or 'he culled hard'. No different than the kid with lack of patience today, regardless of the reason, starting early is never a good idea. Maybe the only difference between the two is the likelihood of the dog making it thru was a little higher then than now. But that is just opinion. No hard facts to support it.

    Most definitely agree with the FB and internet thing. The biggest thing to happen to the dogs ever was the internet and at the same time maybe the worse. (as I type away, LOL)

    Crazy.

    S




     
    Tiznow, david63, oldguy and 1 other person like this.
  12. blueboy

    blueboy Big Dog

    It’s not just your opinion. Some of those idiots who brought in dogs back then I wouldn’t even call dogmen. I remember being told about Jailhouse, got told it was a week after coming out of Q kennels. I said to the lad who told me to contact the lad who owns her and say I’ll take Jailhouse, the look on his face was a picture.
     
    david63 and oldguy like this.
  13. stickler

    stickler Banned

    It was said to me that the dogs of today are much better as the ones from 20 years ago.
    Today dogs don't have the time to start slowly.
    And there was no space for discussion. It's just like that. Over.

    But I still have to disagree ... of coarse.
     
    david63, slim12 and oldguy like this.
  14. slim12

    slim12 Super Moderator Staff Member

    From that angle, I agree. If they are not given the time they need/deserve and make it anyway, maybe they are better now than before.

    I can see that as a valid argument.

    My heart and my head will not allow me to agree, but I can see where it would be a valid place to make a solid argument.

    I guess my thoughts are as the number of people increase the quality of the dogs decrease.

    No data or facts, just opinion, but I would say 40 years ago for every 10 guys with bulldogs at least 8 or 9 was actually doing them. 20 years later that dropped to six or seven out of ten and now I would say it is could be as low a 2 or 3.

    Those other seven are selling puppies based on the what the 2 or 3 have done/are doing.

    Slippery slope.

    S
     
    stickler likes this.
  15. stickler

    stickler Banned

    If they are matching two 14 months old dogs ... one has to make it.
    I was telling that I believe schooling is very important and a beautiful thing to see if done right ...
    Why schooling ? Roll them early at 9-10 months and show them next if they are good acting. This is not 20 years ago.
    OK ! ... ???
     
  16. AGK

    AGK Super duper pooper scooper Administrator

    Rolling them under a year old will ruin more of them than it will make.....

    They are puppies both mentally and physically. That would go for back then and in today's time.

    There are dogs that can do that like Gr Ch yellowman won his first at at 14 months I believe but thats not the norm in any time. Those are the exceptions to the rule IMO. They aren't machines.
     
    c_note and slim12 like this.
  17. slim12

    slim12 Super Moderator Staff Member

    I'm lucky in the fact I was 'helped' coached' into having some patience. If it were not for the situation I fell into I am sure I would have started them or allowed them to start early as well.

    Not up on a pedestal by any means, just my situation.

    A buddy of mine and I were putting a mill together last night and I had some of the very conversations. I had a friend once who believed when the puppy leaned forward and made the chain tight toward another dog the he was ready. I did not agree with his methods, his percentages were low for the longest, but in the end he had a yard full of game ass-been just about to the other side Eli dogs. If a dog made it to 2 years old there, he would make it anywhere.

    My argument was just think of how many more would have made it if you had waited and he replied just think about how long I would have had to feed them to get there.

    I could not wrap my head around his way of thinking.

    Another buddy told me if you go out looking to make bulldogs, you can. And if you go out looking to find curs, well, you can do that too.

    That is perspective.

    S
     
  18. stickler

    stickler Banned

    I got the feeling that most today are looking for exactly this, the exceptions to the rule dog.
    They are not looking for the average ch or gr ch anymore. The goal today is the Gr Ch ROM female. That's the holy grail today.
    Guess it's about fame.
     
    david63, Gilberto S and AGK like this.
  19. Revelator

    Revelator Big Dog

    This thread can use a bump, definitely some great knowledge being dropped. Newcomers take note.
     
  20. ben brockton

    ben brockton CH Dog

    All the same shit. I'd more than likely walk away from someone taking about " new school" only thing really changes is nutrition, after care and conditioning to a certain degree. Odds are if they talking new school then they probably born in the 90's and just got a pedsonline account so we ain't got much to talk about lol
     
    patjr, Ssdd, Revelator and 1 other person like this.

Share This Page