1. Welcome to Game Dog Forum

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

Myspace List

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by Mr Mark, Sep 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GSDbulldog

    GSDbulldog CH Dog

    :eek:
    not again.


    (just kiddin' Marty. I say... give her das boot)
     
  2. Marty

    Marty Banned

    Over one stupid member ?

    Not on you life LOL
     
  3. Marty

    Marty Banned

    Thread closed, No need in this...

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Marty

    Marty Banned

    This blog is set to private. This user must add
    you as a friend to see his/her blog.

    You can't hide from me LOL

    The damage is already done :rolleyes:
     
  5. masta of game

    masta of game Banned

    The more people who report her for "cyber-bullying" the better, as it will get her kicked off of myspace. I have done this and so have others who don't want some dumb young girl who knows nothing of what she's talking about to be slandering people. Look over your page to find out how to report abuse.

    and if u want even tell everybody else in this forum to do the same
     
  6. Mr Mark

    Mr Mark Guest

    As I stated on page 2!


    Well, at least you gave her the opportunity Marty. Unfortunately, she's got a very narrow, one track mind, not to mention she needs a whole lot more real life experiences! I didn't even really comment on most the crap she was writing because I already knew where she stood. I went through this sh*t with her two years ago! Bon Voyage from this site Oliveah!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 15, 2008
  7. Marty

    Marty Banned

    Thread reopened for discussion, I'm going to try one more time ;)
     
  8. Michele

    Michele Premium Member Premium Member

    Oliveah3158: This forum in no way condones dog fighting. Your "opinions" on your myspace page can put innocent people in jeopardy of losing their dogs. Accusing someone of dogfighting is a serious slander. OPINIONS like yours are what gets people arrested, and gets their dogs murdered.

    I would advise you at this point, to please stop with your "opinions". IF your opinion does get someone arrested falsely, there will be heavy legal consequences that YOU will have to pay.

    I personally know the owner of this site, as well as some of the members. This site DOES NOT condone dogfighting in any way, shape or form.

    Apologizing to people that YOU placed on your little list does not mean anything. You put their family, their life in jeopardy by what you did.

    From this point on, think about your actions and what you do. Also, remember my username. I'm not going to be a person you will forget.

    I don't care how many dogs you own, I don't care what breed of dog you own, I don't care how much experience you have. The ONLY thing I care about is making sure that your ignorant opinions don't cause a chain of events that could possibly lead to something terrible.

    Am I making myself clear? Do you understand?
     
  9. Marty

    Marty Banned

    Thanks Michele for chiming in ;)
     
  10. coolhandjean

    coolhandjean CH Dog

    Well Oliveah, I was hoping that you did come to learn, but as my gut feeling told me, you just came to "dig" and try to find more people to accuse of being a dog fighter.

    We aren't naive. We know there are dog fighters that exist in the USA, and we know that there might be even some that come to this website. However, none of us are going to just accuse someone of being a dog fighter. Mainly, because you never know 100% unless you catch the person in the act. Also, if someone is a true dog fighter, they are generally "smart" enough not to talk about their doings on the web. The people who usually brag on the web are wanna-bes who think if they pretend they are dog fighters, people will think they are hot sh*t when they are really just fools.

    You act as if Dog fighting is the worse crime going on right now in the world. You know I am actually a bit sick of Law Enforcement using all their resources to hunt down dog fighters, when people are raping/molesting babies and children, and then Law Enforcement says, "We don't have the resources to get them." They have the resources to save dogs but not children? Doesn't that seem a bit off to you? Shouldn't the children of our country come before the dogs? If all the rapists and murders were in jail, then I'd be fine with Law Enforcement searching other avenues, but to prioritize dogs over children is a real shame. It just shows how messed up the Legal system is in the USA. So, excuse me if I am not all gun-ho to attack dog fighter when there are much bigger evils out there.

    If you don't want to believe a word we say, that is your business, but don't waste our time, and pretend you really care what we have to say or that you really want to learn. Don't accuse us of serious charges. Don't slander us on your myspace page. Just leave us be, and we will leave you alone as well.
     
  11. Michele

    Michele Premium Member Premium Member

    Oliveah3158: I'm posting every single thing from your ignorant blog in this thread. Let's start, shall we?



    I was recently booted off of www.game-dog.com because I was "accusing" people of dogfighting, when I discovered a forum titled "A World Of Perspective: Is Our Box Getting Smaller?" The context of this forum was to me more than alarming as it appeared to be (and quite obviously so) a discussion on comparing APBT fighting dogs with fighting dogs overseas and speculating as to whether or not increasing the Pit Bull's size would affect their ability in the box. This was not a forum discussion for historical purposes whatsoever. In fact, the opening of the forum began to state the Animal Wellfare Act of 1976 and then concluded in "bla bla bla". Obviously this is someone who does not take this act very seriously. These men compared dogfighting to boxing and talked about how " the larger dogs overseas can scratch almost as well as 'our little terriers'." They also spoke of how the pit bull is the perfect fighting dog and does not need to change one bit, and how they can match for as long as 3 hours. There were two statements referencing that this is "hypothetical" as it is illegal and was followed by a winking smiley face[​IMG] as if to say "Watch me cover my butt and you cant say a thing about it." As you can imagine I was repulsed because I was invited to the site to defend my suspicions of certain MYSPACE PROFILES. Taking these angry pit bull breeders up on their invite, I heard people talking about how I should not judge other people because their dogs could be taken away and how I dont have any proof as I have not seen anyone fighting dogs. (Mind you, my list compiled of suspicious profiles was in no way intended to have anyone's animals taken away...seeing as that would be hard to do with no exact location or first and last name and no solid evidence. I was simply suspicious). I posted the disturbing forum I came across between debates on the myspace issue....in the forum I was actively participating in over "accusing owners of dogfighting." One member suggested that they could be "pretending" and there is nothing wrong with the discussion because he has the disclaimer in the beginning of the forum. But yet and still the dogmen on this dogfighting forum I discovered, were making comments like "I would never put my boy up against a 150 lb monster...he might be hot and ready but Im not stupid". Is that not suspicious? Ok but are you ready for the kicker? When I showed the OWNER of the site, this forum...he told the other members that I was stupid and ignorant and then proceeded to shove his site's disclaimer in my face and insist he does not condone dogfighting. Then he closed down THE FORUM ABOUT THE MYSPACE PROFILES and kicked me off the site! This is a huge issue I am alarmed about because this is a site where while not everyone is fighting their dogs, dogfighters are networking under the guise of owning a "working" apbt. Members of the site also told me that culling in order to preserve the "true to standard" APBT was needed. Some member's had quotes "saying cull and cull again". I understand that humanley euthanizing dogs that do not have a healthy tempermant as well as dogs that clearly have health issues beyond repair is needed but to kill dogs that just basically are not "game enough" is disgusting. Please repsond with your opinion on the matter and tell me that I am not crazy. I am so angry that the site now does not allow you to see the forums unless you are a member. Clearly, this is a suspicious website as one member has already been raided and had 115 dogs siezed from his home. As you can imagine, all the members feel this is unfair and they HATE Peta/HSUS (which I dont care for but certainly I dont think they are the anti-Christ). They also are trying to raise money for Floyd Boudreaux who also had his game dogs seized. It is sickening because a lot of these people are not even dog fighters they are just united on the issue for some reason.

    THE OWNER OF GAME-DOG.COM COULDNT UNDERSTAND WHY I WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT A POST LIKE THIS AND INSISTS HE DOES NOT CONDONE DOGFIGHTING.
    http://www.game-dog.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11934
     
  12. Michele

    Michele Premium Member Premium Member

    You wanna call people out.....I can do the same thing
     
  13. Michele

    Michele Premium Member Premium Member

  14. Michele

    Michele Premium Member Premium Member

    ...........................cant seem to get this part to print here
     
  15. coolhandjean

    coolhandjean CH Dog

    You know deep down inside I always thought I was the Anti-Christ. Thank God or should I say the Anti-God that this girl came to the forum so I could know it was all true.

    Also, her name doesn't have a line through it and it says active member? So, why does she think she is banned? Did I miss something?
     
  16. sadieblues

    sadieblues Premium Member Premium Member

    AWWWW .. Nice Video Marty I really loved that :)
     
  17. chinasmom

    chinasmom CH Dog

    She was banned when Marty Shut down the thread. He's giving her another chance it seems.
     
  18. KuttersKru

    KuttersKru Top Dog

    Aww and I missed all this. Boo. No offence meant upon you Oliveah, but you posess a very nasty case of tunnel vision and you seem to be pretty sheltered. I can't beleive that you honestly thought that show breeders don't cull, whether it be humane euthanization or getting the dog fixed, especially since on many "pet" quality contracts they demand that the dog be spayed or neutered. What do you think happens to those pups that aren't up to par with the standards and can't be sold? They go off and live life on fluffy clouds of rainbow kisses? Breeders of damn near everything cull, don't kid yourself. Also, before you go and spout off about Jessup not culling or euthing dogs, you may want to ask around about what happened to "Guppy The Puppy". And for the record there is ALWAYS room for breed improvement, whether he be a work or showdog. Just like people here are always striving for a better bulldog, people elsewhere are striving for a better German Shepherd, Malanois, or other breed while maintaining a standard. A wieghtpuller with APBTs wants a pit that works harder to pull greater weight, a schutzhund handler with German Shepherds wants to make a GSD with a better grip and drive, and a hunter that uses Coonhounds wants them to have an even better sense of smell. Is there something horribly wrong with breed improvement to you?

    Talking to you has become similar to bashing my head against a brick wall several times sadly, in the fact that it has become painfull and repetitive because you will not stand to reason that you are just plain wrong and misinformed on many things. Rather than actually listen, you instead chose to nitpick and scream at things you found questionable. This is a breed that requires a certain amount of open-mindedness and you just don't seem to have it. So by all means love the breed...but do it from a distance and please please PLEASE never own one
     
  19. Mr Mark

    Mr Mark Guest

    This is firsthand knowledge of how people like Oliveah twist and manipulate information for the betterment of her cause. These people are liberal communists that want to take away your rights as free Americans and instill their theories and beliefs for everyone to follow. You need to understand that you cannot get them to understand this concept of freedom and rights. They don't care! You cannot be nice to these people because that won't work! They need to be exposed and resisted in everyway possible. It's very sad, but there are communists living amongst us and they don't even know they are communists!
     
  20. Marty

    Marty Banned

    6:33 PM - KICKED OFF GAME-DOG.COM!
    I was recently booted off of www.game-dog.com because I was "accusing" people of dogfighting,

    Yep you sure were

    when I discovered a forum titled "A World Of Perspective: Is Our Box Getting Smaller?" The context of this forum was to me more than alarming as it appeared to be (and quite obviously so) a discussion on comparing APBT fighting dogs with fighting dogs overseas and speculating as to whether or not increasing the Pit Bull's size would affect their ability in the box.

    This was not a forum discussion for historical purposes whatsoever.

    As far as I know having ideals is not against the law. Opinions and beliefs are protected by the constitution of the United States of America. Discussions relating to individual philosophies or thoughts on topics are also protected. This is why Nazi forums (as an example) are allowed to continue. Many people feel the existence of those Nazi forums to be "alarming" to the general public. Yet, people like you feel that talking about dog matching is more distressful.

    The thread "A World Of Perspective: Is Our Box Getting Smaller?" was never intended to be considered "historical". The thread was intended to be EDUCATIONAL to those who own dogs who were bred from game bloodlines. Nowhere in the X number of posts in that thread did anyone speak of any current or actual illegal event that occurred in the USA or out of it. The ENTIRE thread dealt with thoughts and beliefs relating to our dogs and those other breeds created with the same work ability in mind. If this forum dealt with Greyhounds, we would be comparing them to other breeds of dogs created for the same purpose.[/B]


    In fact, the opening of the forum began to state the Animal Wellfare Act of 1976 and then concluded in "bla bla bla". Obviously this is someone who does not take this act very seriously.

    Incorrect, that was his way to protest that act. Protesting governmental laws is also his right AND duty as a citizen of the USA. That 1976 act is very serious as it is used to incarcerate people, break up families, and kill dogs.

    These men compared dogfighting to boxing and talked about how " the larger dogs overseas can scratch almost as well as 'our little terriers'."

    Incorrect, most see it more like MMA than boxing. The sport of boxing is too dangerous to be compared to dog matching.

    They also spoke of how the pit bull is the perfect fighting dog and does not need to change one bit, and how they can match for as long as 3 hours.

    That statement is a fact. Our breed is the best all-around breed in existence today. Tosa Ken, Bully Kuttas, Kooches, and Kangal owners will all agree that the American Pit Bull Terrier is the best pound-for-pound breed in existence.

    There were two statements referencing that this is "hypothetical" as it is illegal and was followed by a winking smiley face as if to say "Watch me cover my butt and you cant say a thing about it."

    Interesting how ASSuming makes you look. If someone use "hypothetical" they more likely meant "My opinion and belief"....again, protected by the Constitution.

    We can say anything we damn want. This is what you do not want. You do not want US to express our opinions and beliefs....you want only your opinions and beliefs to be protected. This NOT how our laws work. You and I can say whatever we want. There is no need to cover anyone's butt because it is an opinion on a topic. No one mentioned doing anything illegal. Remember that speaking of something illegal is NOT illegal.


    As you can imagine I was repulsed because I was invited to the site to defend my suspicions of certain MYSPACE PROFILES. Taking these angry pit bull breeders up on their invite, I heard people talking about how I should not judge other people because their dogs could be taken away and how I dont have any proof as I have not seen anyone fighting dogs.

    You neglect to mention that innocent people's lives are ruined on sheer "suspicions" without evidence. That innocent people are being harassed, fired from jobs, and chastised from their communities because of "suspicions". Should our community welcome someone that has made it a purpose to single people out without any base or background?

    (Mind you, my list compiled of suspicious profiles was in no way intended to have anyone's animals taken away...seeing as that would be hard to do with no exact location or first and last name and no solid evidence. I was simply suspicious).

    Suspicious? Dictators kill people due to suspicions. What was your intention if not to have "someone" check these profiles to the fullest extent? You are throwing the rock but not taking blame for the broken window.

    I posted the disturbing forum I came across between debates on the myspace issue....in the forum I was actively participating in over "accusing owners of dogfighting." One member suggested that they could be "pretending" and there is nothing wrong with the discussion because he has the disclaimer in the beginning of the forum.

    Again, the pretending is just a "what if" or a "if it was legal" or a "this is my opinion". All of which again are protected by the Constitution.

    The Nazis, KKK, and many other types of extreme opinion base forums exist. Many of those relate to human to human suffering. Yet, you and many others concentrate on animal rights?

    Someone does have a skew sense of priority and it is not us.


    But yet and still the dogmen on this dogfighting forum I discovered, were making comments like "I would never put my boy up against a 150 lb monster...he might be hot and ready but Im not stupid". Is that not suspicious?

    You seem to enjoy the word "suspicious". What is questionable about a person saying he would not fight his dog? If he says "he would" it is suspicious and if he says "he would not" then it is also suspicious, does that make any sense to you? It is called, Catch 22.

    Ok but are you ready for the kicker? When I showed the OWNER of the site, this forum...he told the other members that I was stupid and ignorant and then proceeded to shove his site's disclaimer in my face and insist he does not condone dogfighting

    Well, I think I said "stupid" because you act and react without evidence. I think I used the word "ignorant" because you do not know of what you speak. You have acknowledged NOT have a strong understanding of this topic. Yet, you write and express yourself as if you were an expert. That is a stupid and ignorant thing to do.

    Continued below...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page