Has this ever happened to you?

Stinks that these punks felt they could just walk up and demand your dog...But like others have said, keep an eye out. This time they tried muscle to get a dog. Next time they might try to sneak and get one.

 

just get a gun turrent on the roof. 50 caliber

 

Please be careful. Keep your dogs safe.

 

that's what I was referring to, but trying to be subtle...a barret's .50 cal sniper rifle. It will cost a few grand, but you can stop their asses from 3,000 meters. lol.

BTW, cocking a shotgun sends a clear signal, but readying a M2 (military nomenclature for .50 cal) is unmistakeable as you mean business.

 

stop them? lol more like blow a piece off them and send them flying lol

 

lol...stop them, and the vehicle they're traveling in...too funny.

 

now your talkin....lol

 

I fully subscribe to shock and awe......kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out!

I actually carry a 40cal Baby Eagle, i generally hold of on the heavy equipment, depending on the threat

 

Reminds me of the horrible remake, of Gone in 60 seconds with Nicholas Cage. They are boosting some cars, just get another one to load up in the truck, when some punk pulls a gun on them and tries a hi-jacking (in a car that isn't even theirs). The older guy beats the hell out of him, takes his gun, and says something along the lines of "You immature, no brained idiot. You wouldn't know the first thing about stealing a car!". When he walks away "Boy, you need a role model!"

LOL

 

You thought it was a horrible remake? I didn’t think it was the best movie but I wouldn’t call it horrible.

 

Good movie, but "horrible" remake. It's hard to beat the original, and this one just didn't come close. With a different name, and story line, it could of been great. I bought it as a remake, and judged it next to it's predecesor. Computer Generated Graphics, and trick camera shots just don't quite make up for the real driving skill, and nostalgia cars in the original. Have you seen it? The number of cars they actually destroy, is astronomical. The last 45 minutes of the movie, is a multi-city chase, with some of the best driving you'll ever see. No gimicks, just a ballsy stuntman and cars tough enough to pull through!

I'll be the first to admit, the acting in the original is horrible. But, it's a car movie.

Hollywood made it a real movie, type movie, with a better plot, big name actors, and lots of special effects. Sold alot more tickets, and intrigued a much bigger demographic, but it took away from the integrity of the original with the cliche' role casting. The "villian" and the last minute replacement who doesn't talk, are perfect examples of what I didn't like about the movie.


Pretty decent movie, had it not used the Gone in 60 seconds name imo.

 

No I haven’t seen the original. I have that blockbuster all access and I am running out of movies I haven’t seen so I will have to order it. I would like to see a movie were there was actual skill involved. I do drag and autocross in my car.

 

Oh man I'm glad you got the situtation taken care of at that moment, but I agree with everyone else as to keep an eye out for a while.

I've got a relative who has had one bitch stolen twice, both times recovered - both by the same person who was refused a pup.

 

go to a sporting goods store buy a flare gun..no bullets so no bullistics..can break it with a hammer so no weapon..fire it into a car ..shoots a mile to a mile and a half...at point blank in the mouth...wha-la jack-o-lantern......most important shoot first ...ask questions last:cool: ...and rule #1 never pull a gun out unless you plan on using it..

 

Serbu Super-Shorty 12ga

 

I'm sure he appreciates all of our inputs, but its not like he's in Iraq. No need to lay on his rooftop manning the .50 Cal or behind a turret. LOL. I'm sure his shotgun and 9mm will do just fine.

 

LOL...I loose track of that from time to time. I was only half kidding though. People knew that a soldier raising a m4 carbine meant he was probably not going to fire. On the flip side...they didn't want to see whether he was bluffing or not with the M2. Actually, just turning the gunner's turret was enough to clear a path.

On the serious side...I'd still bump that 9mm up to atleast a 45. The 9mm might not stop a 200lb man at 25 meters...I have little doubt that a 45 would.

 

u really don't think so, comeon man if i was shot with a damn 22 i'd stop in my tracks not a damn 9, plus if the one don't stop the guy keep pulling the hammer, theres at least 10 more were that came from

 

I guess this is headed off topic quickly, but I was saying that the 9mm is not reliable to stop sh!t. If I did use a 9mm it would be a MP5 (fully auto). Also with a .22 the higher the velocity the less likely it will put a man down in one or two shots. For example, a Nato .556 round (fired from M-16, M4, or civilian Ar15) usually will travel through a man too quickly. If he's medium to large sized (with adrenaline pumping) and has to cover less than the length of a room he will reach you before you stop him. (barring you put one between his eyes. Also unlikely given adrenaline, it's probably night, you probably don't have optics sights on that handgun, and the average joe doesn't fire enough to shoot that well). I have experienced a man get shot 6 times (with a 9mm) in the midsection, one round rupturing his scrotum, and he walked to me bleeding to get medical treatment. He was not stopped by that shit. He lost his thumb, but lived another day.

You are right though keep shooting...it will take alot. Those are the realities from close quarters combat, and not what is perpetrated by hollywood. Men usually don't fly backward when shot and die immediately like in the movies. I understand a little about weapons, and to be better safe than sorry more than a 9mm is needed to reliably stop someone.

 

so a 50 cal shot from a turrent gun doesnt send people flying? not to sound like an idiot but i thought tht it was tht powerful of a shot