1. Welcome to Game Dog Forum

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

Gr ch fmk/f2f/solo's titere 7xw

Discussion in 'Dog Discussion' started by CHUVALOFAN, Sep 16, 2014.

  1. BOTP Kennels

    BOTP Kennels Big Dog

    How much for starws off titere would run for? I know he is early in,his stud career..I also like that balboa dogs pedigree alot and I see he is producing quite alright
     
  2. ragedog10

    ragedog10 Top Dog

    None being let go as of yet, last time time I spoke to SM he said he might let a few go in the future.
     
  3. Saiyagin

    Saiyagin Chihuahua Premium Member

    Its only a preposterous notion if you believe that the actual cause is from superstition and old wives tales. LMAO
     
  4. feastodg

    feastodg Big Dog

    cause science lmfoaoaoao
     
  5. Saiyagin

    Saiyagin Chihuahua Premium Member

    Although science can play a role in the cause , the cause can also be explained from a scientific point of view. What view you choose to believe in is up to you. Whether its a superstitious wives tale or the truth....damn that sound like a rap verse LMAO
     
  6. feastodg

    feastodg Big Dog

    while I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, anecdotal fallacies and confirmation bias are not proof. I'm sure there are many variables that go into one making this observation and taking it as fact. how many first time breedings are kept in capable hands as opposed to repeat breedings? a good dog is as likely to come from the first litter as the last, but the good dog may just go unnoticed. in the end, even when consistency is the goal, it can be a crap shoot.
     
  7. Saiyagin

    Saiyagin Chihuahua Premium Member

    Aint most science based on anecdotal fallacies and confirmation bias hence why most are known as theories and not facts? It works both ways, the proof is in the (pudding) truth LMAO

    Most times Repeat breedings are in capable hands more so then the first breeding because of what the FIRST breeding has shown and PROVED. A experienced person can see a good dog regardless of where or what it came down from even if the dog is from a mixed breed breeding LOL

    I agree with the every breeding being a crap shoot even when consistency is involved. BUT when you SAID genetics dont work a certain way it seems as if you were implying you know exactly how genetics works and exactly what it will or wont do in each and every breeding.
     
  8. feastodg

    feastodg Big Dog

    You misunderstand, I have a rudimentary understanding of genetics despite taking specifically relevant classes in college, it is a complex subject and still not fully understood. i was just saying that with the randomness of it all, more implied, it is absurd to think that all the "good" jeans are used up in the first litter. statistically speaking, we can assume that if an above average amount of good dogs come out of the first litter that subsequent breeding will yield a lower average, unless that dog is just a phenomenal producer of course. but that over time, all breedings considered, the ratio of good to bad produced would remain fairly consistent, assuming every dog was in capable hands. I don't think its wrong to not pursue a repeat breeding if the first produced better than expected, i just think its folly to believe that only first time breedings produce the best and have the greatest yield.
     
  9. Robertosilva

    Robertosilva CH Dog

    Lmao, studied genetics in college and uses the word "jeans" instead of "genes", lol not even auto correct can be blamed for that one. Did you fail that course?
     
  10. feastodg

    feastodg Big Dog

    of course that was predictive text autocorrect. don't be mad cause you don't understand half of what i was saying, jealous that you didn't attend college, and are a scrub pointing out a simple spelling error. i understand your small mind, and your small wallet, but don't take your small dick problems out on me home boy. go back to posting old articles robitcho.
     
  11. Robertosilva

    Robertosilva CH Dog

    Lol how would predictive text ever recognise the word jeans as genes, not even close but nice try dumbo. Yes I will stick to posting old articles as that is what I enjoy reading and sharing.

    Guess in all my posting of old articles I never came across the Levi bloodline and Bulldogs wearing denim. It's all in the Jeans, dem bulldogs sure love some.

    Maybe you should go back and finish that online course BOYO or whatever backwards hillbilly community college your sad ass had the misfortune to enrol in.

    Hitch that trailer up and roll on through like a tumbleweed. When your mom and pop are also your Auntie and Uncle I understand how you may get confused from time to time.

    You can't fix stupid bud.
     
  12. Robertosilva

    Robertosilva CH Dog

    Don't worry mate I just changed my user name to fit, lol. I understand you, it must be hard to focus when you are on your period.
     
  13. feastodg

    feastodg Big Dog

    lol, you make a lot of assumptions. i am not above a grammatical error, i feel no need to proof read my posts. but are you going to refute anything i said or continue with your pathetic ad hominem? seriously. do you have anything intelligent to add? once again, go back to posting old article, cause posting a bunch of cliche responses isn't as interesting.
     
  14. Robertosilva

    Robertosilva CH Dog

    To quote what you said after I picked you up on a misspelling, talk about cliches. "Small dick problems". You could have replied honestly but you set your fate.
     
  15. feastodg

    feastodg Big Dog

    so after your wall of text and double post you back peddle? i was honest, autocorrect mean it was spelled wrong, or are you dumb enough to believe i don't know the difference? you just wanted to be cute and petty. now, do you actually have anything of substance to say?
     
  16. Saiyagin

    Saiyagin Chihuahua Premium Member

    Actually your the one that is misunderstood as I am not saying that every first litter is better then the rest. what I am saying is that first litters being better are a lot more common now days then they were of old. There are more and more breedings now days with the first litter being better then the rest and it is not just happening by randomness/chance meaning its not just chalked up too superstitious or old wives tales as there is scientific reasoning behind it as to why this is happening more often then before.
     
  17. Robertosilva

    Robertosilva CH Dog

    You were literally saying nothing in your post and you were not backing it up with any source or evidence for your innate ramblings.
    You sat on the fence and made no real comments worth posting.

    I picked you up on a jean instead of gene which whatever you say was no auto correct, not even close. You then went full retard on me.

    Lol, anyways I am done in this thread so enjoy your evening buttercup, sunshine or princess whichever you prefer to be called.
     
  18. Saiyagin

    Saiyagin Chihuahua Premium Member

    Who knows maybe he was listening to the song Billy Jean by M.Jackson as Billy Jean is not my lover hes just a girl who claims that I am the one but the kid is not my son. LMAO
     
  19. Robertosilva

    Robertosilva CH Dog

  20. Forever-So REAL

    Forever-So REAL Quintuple Grand Champion Premium Member

    :rofl::rofl::thinking::threadjacked:
     

Share This Page