Drones and the law

I just watched a news channel and they were talking drone and the law. I believe this is a good topic for doggers to understand and take heed to. They are estimating that in the next 10 years there will be over 100,000 drones in the skys above. Now yes police will have some but most will be regular folks.

While police say they will be using them for missing people and various police dutys. The reason I said various is that for any reason they use it, lets say a missing child. Ok missing child, so they take to the sky and clear 1000's of miles. On there search they come up empty BUT!!! they spotted a large dog kennel that had all the signs of dog fighting ring ( Blue or white barrels, dogs spots, dog chains,) so they go back and get a warrant together because they believe they have PROBABLE CAUSE. You see they can use whats called Exigent circumstance. (please google and read in detail and try your best to understand this, read it several times and even youtube it.)
They can and will move in on you.
This is why I am predicting the days of large kennels is pretty much soon coming to an end.
I believe new laws will be written for more because it will get out of hand and the peoples rights to privacy will be violated over and over again but till then it will be ugly for most large kennel operations.

Lets talk about some pointers law wise and this is how law officers are taught.
Were there is drugs there are guns.
Now with game dogs they are saying were there are game dogs there are drugs and guns and large money.
I will be working on this topic more and hit on important topics, till then please read up on Exigent circumstance, and study up on drone and there future and law.
Remember civilians will have them also and can turn you in in a heart beat if they see something they deem suspicious. The latter will be the biggest down fall.

 

An exigent circumstance, in the American law of criminal procedure, allows law enforcement to enter a structure without a search warrant, or if they have a "knock and announce" warrant, without knocking and waiting for refusal under certain circumstances. It must be a situation where people are in imminent danger, evidence faces imminent destruction, or a suspect will escape.
In the criminal procedure context, exigent circumstance means:
An emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect, or destruction of evidence. There is no ready litmus test for determining whether such circumstances exist, and in each case the extraordinary situation must be measured by the facts known by officials.[1]
Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.[2]
Exigent circumstances may make a warrantless search constitutional if probable cause exists. The existence of exigent circumstances is a mixed question of law and fact.[3] There is no absolute test for determining if exigent circumstances exist, but general factors have been identified. These include: clear evidence of probable cause; the seriousness of the offense and likelihood of destruction of evidence; limitations on the search to minimize the intrusion only to preventing destruction of evidence; and clear indications of exigency.
Exigency may be determined by: degree of urgency involved; amount of time needed to get a search warrant; whether evidence is about to be removed or destroyed; danger at the site; knowledge of the suspect that police are on his or her trail; and/or ready destructibility of the evidence.[4] In determining the time necessary to obtain a warrant, a telephonic warrant should be considered. As electronic data may be altered or eradicated in seconds, in a factually compelling case the doctrine of exigent circumstances will support a warrant-less seizure.
Even in exigent circumstances, while a warrant-less seizure may be permitted, a subsequent warrant to search may still be necessary.

 

In laymen terms, were so screwed. The worst part is, we'll just sit back and allow it....

 

Super soaker 2000 should do the trick.he he..or like someone on tv said........pull...........

 

They also using to record houses..to soon put realtors outa bizness.they said soon people will ride them.....meet george jetson....jane his wife...daughter judy..his boy elroy...can't forget.....astro.

 

Some will sit back and allow it, and some will stand up and demand it, but you are right no-one is going to actively fight it, we are far past that stop on this train line..
TRUTH IS TREASON IN THIS EMPIRE OF LIES

 

Thanks AGK.
The FAA will be involved in how and were you can fly them. Poperatzy will use them to take pictures of the rich. Its time to get rid of the blue barrels and use nice gauges with covers and keep your #'s super low.
Exigent circumstance is also a cop chasing a suspect and he chases him through your house because the suspect ran through it, the police follow and you in there doing all type of illegal shit! Now he has the right to be there and they will use the right to be right to see.

 

You may laugh, but the lost sport of Kings (falconry) will have to make a come back to protect private airspace.

 

A fella around the way fly them in Afghanistan. Left the army and does if private sector now. There everywhere and have been a long time. Start building infred houses with lazer Mic blickers if you want privacy nowadays.

 

There using them to sell real estate, show college campuses to potential students.
There all type of uses. Shits scary if you ask me. Tree hungers will defiantly be using this shit to fuck up some yards. Time to down size

 

anyone see the show BONES last night the tiger in the tale ? they got at hobby plane and put a camera on it and then flew it over a guys ranch and seen something they wanted to look at closer . they videoed it and said they could tell the judge they got the video from a hobbyist to get a search warrant lol .