PDA

View Full Version : San Francisco Forum addresses pit bull warning signs




Marty
06-09-2005, 12:35 PM
San Francisco, CA -- Pit bull supporters -- defensive after last week's fatal attack of a 12-year-old boy by his family's pit bulls -- used a city-sponsored forum in San Francisco on Wednesday night to inform the public about the facts and the myths of the canine breed.

"We're hopefully alleviating some of the anxiety that people are feeling about dogs, particularly about pit bulls,'' said Donna Duford, an animal behaviorist with the San Francisco Animal Care & Control agency who says pit bulls, as a breed, shouldn't be feared.

Duford joined Donna Reynolds, founder of the advocacy group BAD RAP (Bay Area Doglovers Responsible about Pit Bulls) to present the workshop, which was organized by the city's animal agency in response to Friday's fatal mauling of Nicholas Faibish.

Duford said that the pit bull breed shouldn't be feared, but that individual animals may exhibit cause for alarm. She outlined some common-sense warning signs and precautions people should take to avoid the potential for problems with pit bulls and other dogs.

For example, she said, children and dogs should never be left alone, and people should never approach strange dogs until their owners say it's OK. Stay away from dogs that snarl, growl, snap or have a stiff body.

Proper training of pit bulls, and the people who care for them, is a must, and spaying or neutering the animal is highly recommended to make them less aggressive.

Reynolds said a properly bred pit bull should "never be aggressive toward people.'' Red flags of a potentially problematic pit bull, she said, are that they don't like to be touched, they're overly territorial, they're hard to calm down or they're overly fearful, easily stressed or aloof. Anyone of these traits, she said, is enough for people to get a professional assessment of their dog's behavior.

A second workshop has been scheduled for Saturday morning at the agency's Mission District headquarters.

The stated purpose of the seminars is to help pit bull owners understand their dogs' behavior and to recognize potential signs of aggression. At Wednesday's session, it also was clear that another purpose was to make sure that pit bulls as a breed don't get a bad rap.

"There's been a lot of fear and paranoia,'' said Reynolds, who has a couple of pit bulls at home. "We're devastated about what happened, and want to make sure people have the right information to prevent something like this from happening again.''

Friday's deadly attack put pit bulls in the public spotlight and prompted city officials, among them Mayor Gavin Newsom, to suggest that new regulations are needed to better control the animals. The mayor convened a task force to look at the issue.

Among the suggestions already raised are mandatory neutering and spaying of pit bulls, requiring them to be muzzled when in public, banning the sale and breeding of pit bulls in San Francisco and mandating the owners partake in special training before they can obtain a license to keep them.

San Francisco's Commission of Animal Control and Welfare is meeting at 5: 30 p.m. today in City Hall to begin the discussion.

E-mail Rachel Gordon at rgordon@sfcrhonicle.com.




Bluepit50
06-10-2005, 08:00 PM
The main rule that everyone should follow regardless of the breed is to not let any dog unsupervised and crate each one seperate with not at home, for the dogs safety too.

miakoda
06-10-2005, 10:56 PM
I'm working on trying to find the article that I read that states a couple interesting things, like........
--the dogs were bought only to breed & for the owner to make money as he (the father) was often unemployed
--the dogs were often running lose in the neighborhood
--the dogs were not trained
--several neighbors admitted to seeing the 12 yr old repeatedly hitting the dogs in the face w/out the dogs reacting aggressively
--the 12 yr old was left alone with the dogs for 2 hours when the incident happened

Although I agree the dogs should have been put down, how much abuse does an animal have to go through before it fights back? Should it never ever defend itself from the cruelty of the hands of its owner?

princess_koka
06-21-2005, 04:46 PM
I'm working on trying to find the article that I read that states a couple interesting things, like........
--the dogs were bought only to breed & for the owner to make money as he (the father) was often unemployed
--the dogs were often running lose in the neighborhood
--the dogs were not trained
--several neighbors admitted to seeing the 12 yr old repeatedly hitting the dogs in the face w/out the dogs reacting aggressively
--the 12 yr old was left alone with the dogs for 2 hours when the incident happened

Although I agree the dogs should have been put down, how much abuse does an animal have to go through before it fights back? Should it never ever defend itself from the cruelty of the hands of its owner?

http://www.news10.net/storyfull1.asp?id=11589
S.F. Mayor Wants to Get Tough on Pit Bullshttp://www.news10.net/assetpool/images/0562022716_pit-bull1-185.jpgSaying it's time to "get serious" is order to prevent future tragedies, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom is calling for a change in the state law that prohibits legislation aimed at specific dog breeds.

During a press conference at the city's animal control facility, Newsom called for stronger laws concerning pit bulls. "There is enough statistical evidence that pit bulls need specific regulations," he said.

Currently, state law does not allow cities or counties to place restrictions on dogs based on their breed. Newsom wants the law amended to allow local legislation when it is necessary to "address public safety and welfare concerns."

A report prepared by the city's animal control director calls for mandatory spaying or neutering of breeds designated as "aggressive" and a ban on so-called "backyard breeding."

The mayor's statements came in the wake of the June 3 fatal mauling of a 12-year-old San Francisco boy by his family's pet pit bulls. Nicholas Faibish was bitten to death in his own home by the two 80-pound dogs.



this is what I heard:
His mother also locked him in the basement with a shovel holding the doors, because the female was in heat the kid got out and they were breeding, the male attacked him. Who in the hell locks their kid in the basement?

GD2
06-21-2005, 05:20 PM
Yeah This Hole Story Is Fu**** Up. And Once Again It Was The Owners Fault.

Pluto's Princess
07-02-2005, 03:38 AM
something everyone should know about that attack: THE FEMALE DOG WAS IN HEAT, THE MALE HAD BITTEN THE BOY PREVIOUSLY THAT DAY AND THE MOM LEFT HIM IN THE OTHER ROOM(THE BOY) WHEN SHE WENT OUT. THE LITTLE BOY LEFT THE ROOM AND GOT MAULED FOR PLACING HIMSELF IN BETWEEN THE TWO MATES. THIS WOULD HAPPEN WITH ANY OTHER ANIMAL; A COW, A DEER, ANYTHING.