PDA

View Full Version : Pit bull owners have special obligation to control pets




Marty
04-27-2007, 06:20 PM
I'm opening this for discussion...

EDITORIAL</MCC SUBHEAD>


<MCC STORY>Although we know we'll be invoking the wrath of some dog lovers, particularly pit bull owners, we must wholeheartedly support the action of a police officer in the recent shooting of a Holly family's pet pit bull

Certainly, there was an emotional tie between the animal and the family, especially the children, and we extend our sympathies for their loss.

But in analyzing the circumstances surrounding the shooting, it appears the officer had little choice - he just couldn't take a chance, considering the breed's track record.

According to reports, the dog ran out of the family home when a door was inadvertently left open.

The stocky, light-brown pit bull, weighing between 70 and 80 pounds, approached a man living nearby.

Understandably, the man became fearful and called police.

Holly Police Chief Rollie Gackstetter said the dog began circling a police officer dispatched to the home.

The officer reportedly sprayed a chemical eye-and-nose irritant at the dog at least twice, but without much effect on the animal.

As Gackstetter said, "At that point the dog charged him in the back yard. I The officer had said he was backed up against the house and the deck area."

The police officer then fired three shots at the dog before it ran off and later died.

Gackstetter said the officer acted in accordance with department policies.

It's doubtful that anyone, police officer or not, would not have become concerned and taken whatever defensive measures deemed necessary to fend off the dog.

Complicating the situation, in that neighborhood at least, is the fact that a pit bull matching the description of the one shot was wandering loose.

It's understandable that neighbors would be concerned.

While any dog can turn hostile, depending upon how it is treated and circumstances at the moment, the number of documented pit bull attacks is substantially higher than for any other breed of dog.

It's obvious that, while not all pit bulls are dangerous, the staggering number of attacks involving pit bulls indicates there must be something in that breed's genetics that makes it more volatile than other types of dogs.

Consequently, if people are going to own a pit bull - for the safety of their pet, if nothing less - they probably should take special precautions to make sure the animal doesn't accidentally get out of the house or yard.

These can involve any number of measures, such as making sure all doors are not only properly closed but also locked to keep the dog in the house.

Outside, invisible fences seem to work for many dogs.

Other alternatives might be keeping the dog in a pen or using an extra strong chain and keeping it tied to a post cemented securely in the ground.

After almost every pit bull attack, the owner claims the dog was really quite friendly and docile - and that the action was "unlike the pet." But the excuse that the dog got out by accident and really wasn't dangerous pales in the face of the serious injuries and sometimes deaths caused by rampaging pit bulls.

http://www.theoaklandpress.com/stories/042707/opi_2007042778.shtml</MCC STORY>




bahamutt99
04-27-2007, 06:52 PM
I wish there was a spot for public comment. All dog owners have a "special obligation" to control their damn dogs. If the cops would start shooting loose Labs and Cockers and breeds like that, maybe people would begin to realize this isn't one of those "Pit Bull people" issues. I know that's not a very nice thought, but after wrangling with all the BSL and perception and my-dog-can't-hurt-anybody-because-its-cute issues I've had to mess with lately, that's just how I feel. Let's level the playing field a bit. :mad:

Just a thought from another one of those crazy Pit Bull owners.

FearlessKnight
04-27-2007, 06:53 PM
I am not sure how to take this exactly......
all I do know is that they are trying to stop you from chaining your dogs....but yet these people are telling us that we SHOULD keep them tied on a heavy chain......HUH?
Then.......you kow, dogs know fear....they can sense that sort of thing. So when someone is approached by a dog (even with a wagging tail) and they are scared, that dog is going to know.......I will say that if the dog was 70-80lbs though, it is likely that the temperment was not stable anyways..(NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE) but when you mix dogs like that, you never know what you are going to get anyways.

To add....I am not justifying in any way what the dog did.....if it even did anything, but I do know that if someone were scared of me for no f*cking reason and sprayed me with some sh*t...I would back'm in a corner too!

Michele
04-27-2007, 07:01 PM
i think that if your dog does get out accidentially,the problem is not so much the dog in alot of cases, it's the pedestrians that can't read dog language....

lockjaw
04-27-2007, 07:46 PM
i think if you own a gun..keep it out of a childs reach...and if you own a pitbull or anydog..its your obligation to have 100%control of the dog at all times..i see idiots taking there dogs off the leash at dog parks and the beach...understand your dog does not know he is hated by alot of the ignorent public..but you do..so if you represent the breed..its your job not to let shit like this happen.

jaystreetsA4
04-27-2007, 10:15 PM
i agree with bahamutt. the field needs to be leveled, no more double standards. lab is loose, act the same way. yorkie loose act the same way. not fair.

dog-man
04-27-2007, 10:31 PM
Marty, i agree with all the part of being a responsible pitbull owner, but that shooting wouldnt occured if that neighboor called the AC instead of the cops, pigs oops i mean police officers are not trained or have the equipment to restrain a live animal, the cop had no choice to shoot the poor dog.

CynthiaATL
04-27-2007, 10:35 PM
i think if you own a gun..keep it out of a childs reach...and if you own a pitbull or anydog..its your obligation to have 100%control of the dog at all times..i see idiots taking there dogs off the leash at dog parks and the beach...understand your dog does not know he is hated by alot of the ignorent public..but you do..so if you represent the breed..its your job not to let shit like this happen.

I agree it boils down to responsible ownership.

SMOKIN HEMI
04-27-2007, 10:41 PM
Marty, i agree with all the part of being a responsible pitbull owner, but that shooting wouldnt occured if that neighboor called the AC instead of the cops, pigs oops i mean police officers are not trained or have the equipment to restrain a live animal, the cop had no choice to shoot the poor dog.

I agree they can be shoot first happy and they are not trained for that situation in most cases. When a bear is found they always seem to catch the damn thing and take it back to its habitat I think they could handle a 70-80 pd pitbull. JIMO

jadedpitgirl
04-27-2007, 11:19 PM
The bottom line is this: We, as APBT owners have a bigger responsibility than other dog owners. No matter what we say, any large, growling, loose dog is going to be considered a 'pit bull'. We need to take extra precautions just like the article said. I don't think we need to concrete thier chains into the ground, but we can't make excuses for the dogs' escape. It is our fault and our fault only. Dogs don't just get loose to attack people, but sometimes shit happens. When it does happen, the APBT is going to get blamed.
You CAN NOT blame 'little-dog' owners; You CAN NOT blame the APBT-haters; You CAN NOT blame the AR Humaniacs; They are just following through with what the media tells them-
We as APBT owners have heard all of the media and journalistic bull shit. It's sad, but the reality is in the fact that too many people own this breed, and too many people are ignorant in the duties of a RESPONSIBLE APBT owner.