PDA

View Full Version : Is this positive press?




kensloft
10-29-2006, 01:58 AM
Check out the NY times today, Saturday.

ASPERMONT, Tex. — On a moonless October night, with the Milky Way staining the West Texas (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/national/usstatesterritoriesandpossessions/texas/index.html?inline=nyt-geo) sky, a burly man in overalls turned off the engine of his mud-caked white Toyota truck. Yelps from coyotes and an owl’s hoot occasionally broke the silence. Then, from an open field, Bob Richardson heard the noise he had been awaiting.

Four of his short-haired scent hounds, which had been released earlier, began to bark from the darkness. Mr. Richardson jumped out of the truck and freed a black pit bull from a cage on the truck’s flatbed. He chased after his pit bull into the darkness toward the barking hounds.

He tripped in a wet ditch but kept running through the milo stalks. When he got to the baying dogs, the light on his miner’s hat revealed that the pit bull, trained for just this purpose, had clamped onto the face of a feral hog.

As he had done thousands of times before, Mr. Richardson, 58, pounced on the snorting beast and tied its feet together, immobilizing it. Within minutes, he had loaded the animal barehanded into a cage.

Mr. Richardson used to run through this brush land northwest of Abilene without any shoes, hence his nickname: Barefoot Bob. But when he worked for the fire department in Abilene, his bosses demanded he don footwear. Now, he wears sneakers, which he buys in bulk at Wal-Mart.

A lot of people in rural Texas catch wild hogs, which can grow to several hundred pounds, and Mr. Richardson traps them like most others. But there is sometimes a twist to Mr. Richardson’s hunts — he spends a few nights a week cruising the dirt roads of Stonewall County, a place with more hogs than people, to run down the wild animals using only his dogs and his bare hands.

“It’s for fun,” he said.

It has also become lucrative as Europeans and an increasing number of Americans clamor for wild boar. Mr. Richardson said he made $28,000 last year selling live feral hogs.

“I think it’s a great health-conscious niche market,” said Dick Koehler, one of Mr. Richardson’s customers and the vice president of Frontier Meats, based in Fort Worth. “It has real potential for growth.”

Mr. Koehler said that about 60 percent of the processed hog meat from his plant ended up on the tables of fancy restaurants in Europe, but that its popularity was growing in the United States. Each year, his company ships more and more hog meat to American restaurants and specialty supermarkets to feed the demands for organic food (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/o/organic_food/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier), Mr. Koehler said.

Even if the taste for wild boar gains a much wider following, there is little chance of overhunting the hogs any time soon.

The animals were introduced to North America as a food source in 1539 by the Spanish conquistador Hernando de Soto, said Billy Higginbotham, a wildlife specialist with the Texas A&M (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/t/texas_a_and_m_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org) Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Overton.

During the 1800s and 1900s, escaped domestic pigs became feral, sprouted tusks and grew coarse black hair. They crossbred with Russian boars, brought to North America for food and sport. The resulting hybrid wild boar has spread across the country, increasing in number to an estimated four million in 39 states, Mr. Higginbotham said.

The population of feral hogs has ballooned for a combination of reasons, Mr. Higginbotham said. For one, he said, they are intelligent animals. Also, they will eat just about anything and are highly adaptable to changing food sources.

Wild pigs are prolific breeders. A sow can be ready for her first litter of four to six offspring within six months, and a mature sow can birth two litters a year, Mr. Higginbotham said.

In Texas, hunters bait deer with 300 million pounds of corn annually, he said, and the hogs eat a large percentage of the bait. Hunters sometimes capture feral hogs and release them into areas of the state where they had not lived before.

Wild hogs can bring new problems. In Texas alone, the aggressive, omnivorous and razor-toothed animals cause nearly $52 million in damage a year to farmland, livestock and pastures, according to the Texas Cooperative Extension.

Jerry Eddins, the owner of the 10,000-acre J. Duke Ranch where Mr. Richardson hunts, is a serious quail hunter. Every year, he spreads grain to feed the birds, but hogs eat the bird food, along with whatever quail eggs they come across.

“They eat anything. They really don’t have a natural predator,” Mr. Eddins said. “So, Barefoot Bob Richardson is the natural predator.”




14rock
10-29-2006, 01:31 AM
I think its a decent article, I was glad to see they mentioned how much trouble feral (wild) pigs can cause, and the destruction they bring. Not too bad of an article imo ;)

Pitoogle
10-29-2006, 01:37 AM
well I found it an intresting read :)

bahamutt99
10-29-2006, 02:20 AM
Its a good article, but there are still some strategic writer's tricks used to evoke a certain image in people's minds. "Clamped onto the face of a feral hog" for one. But they also used those tricks talking about the hogs -- ie, "razor-toothed" -- so I guess I don't mind. :) It was an interesting read, either way.

pennsooner
10-29-2006, 08:04 AM
Considering that this piece appeared in the New York Times, its about as good as could be hoped for.

Hoyden
10-29-2006, 08:35 AM
Considering it did not mention dog fighting once, didn't portray pitbulls as a media scapegoat for dog bits, it's pretty good.

It points out, if very briefly, that there is a job and a need for pitbulls.

kensloft
10-30-2006, 03:18 AM
I sent a letter to the editor pointing out that it was a great story but... .

I told them that the skeletal system had nothing that would allow the dynamic of locking its jaws. I also told them that it unfounded in science. Otherwise it is a nice, real article. I hope that other posters will send inquiries into the question of locking jaws to the editor. Nice thing about the Times is that they like to print the truth. How long it will take has a lot to do with the number of people that will point out their error that needs to be rectified. They owe it to their readers to clarify the issue for them. I hope they get enough feedback to bring it to their attention so that they will have it brought to their attention so as to do something about it.

If you go to their website and hit the contact link at the bottom of the page you will be taken to a list of places you may want to go. Hit the letter to the editor in the list and you will be brought to all the editors from the executive on down to circulation. Pick your choose and tell your choice what you feel about the erroneous information being passed off as scientific truth!

I'll be looking to see what kind of correction they will do.

squirt07
10-30-2006, 12:50 PM
I like bacon, ham, pork steaks, chops...

kensloft
10-31-2006, 12:47 AM
Did you see the pictures of a day in the life of the hunt?

Dear Editor,

One of my joys in life is to turn to the science section of the New York Times. It is bristling with what is happening in the world around us. One astutely told story occurred recently in 'With Hand, Hounds Stalking The Feral Pig'. It was a very real look at pig hunting with dogs and the markets that are becoming available for this meat. Turning lemons into lemonade. The thinking man's/woman's staple. It was very real. It was journalism worthy of the New York Times.
However, there is one piece of untrue, unscientific information in the assertion about one of the dogs in the hunting party. It was about the pit bull that captured and slowed down the quarry. The author desribed that the animal had locked its jaws on the prey so that the owner could hog tie the animal which would would then be taken to market. It is a fallacious descriptive mind-picture of what pit bulls do and why they should be wiped off the face of the earth. It is the voo-doo science of public opinion that states that this breed of dog has the ability to lock its jaws. It is the mark of its ferocity. It is entirely erroneous. There is no physical, scientific proof that this or any other breed of dog can do this.

Perpetuating a myth such as this in the Times would be as bad as being the Pope that made Copernicus's life miserable for trying to say that the earth wasn't the center of the universe. This may seem hyperbole but to an owner of the animal it isn't because his/her friend could be taken and destroyed in areas of the country that base their laws on the myth that the locking-jawed beast is bred to attack, kill and maim. What else could a dog like this be? Its jaws lock onto the prey.

This myth is the main divisive issue between the breed's proponents and opponents. People have been trained to be wary of the dog through the amount of space that it has received in the media based on attacks against human beings. On the one hand is the "It's a gun waiting to go off" and on the other is "Bad dog? Bad owner!" Any breed of dog that is taught to be violent will be violent. These are adorable, loving companions. They love human interaction to the point of where they seek out pets and pats from anyone that notices them.

I trust that you will look into this and do what is right.

Yours sincerely,