Verderben
06-05-2006, 06:19 PM
> AMERICAN CANINE FOUNDATION
> 23969 NE State Rte 3
> Suite G101
> Belfair, Wa 98528
>
> June 5th 2006
>
>
> (Tellings / Ohio)
>
> In Ohio we just received word that the Sixth District Court of appeals
> which ruled BSL is unconstitutional denied Toledo's motion to certify a
> conflict of interest between the Tellings case and old constitutional
> challenges that took place in Ohio where they found BSL to be
> constitutional.
> That means the Sixth District Court of Appeals is standing strong on their
> ruling and are making it clear there is no conflict and that their opinion
> is stronger than all other cases in Ohio !!!!!!!
>
> The Ohio Supreme Court has not decided if they are going to hear the
> Tellings case and ACF is ready to file a strong motion to lift a temporary
> stay granted by the Supreme Court while they make their decision.
>
>
>
> RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
>
> ACF called Riverside County and we forwarded the email below to them:
>
>
> From: leigslation2006@hotmail.com
> xxxxxxxxxxx
> xxxxxxxxxx
>>From American Canine Foundation (ACF)
> June 5, 2006
>
>
> To the Riverside Board of Supervisors:
>
> California in the 2005 session passed SB861 which allows local governments
> the rights to mandatory spay and neuter laws with breeding restrictions.
> SB861 was passed on flawed data and it infringes on responsible dog owners
> rights. Mandatory breeding laws do not protect the public and ACF has
> attached a copy of an amended federal complaint naming LA County for your
> information.
>
> In Calfornia statistics show that the populations in shelters has dropped
> by 50% in the last 6 years and adoption has increased while dangerous dog
> impounds has decreased 65%
>
> ACF will amend other counties and city's who choose to adopt laws that
> require mandatory spay and neuter with breeding restrictions that violate
> dog owners rights.
>
> Sincerely,
> Cindy McCammon
> American Canine Foundation
> 360 277 3647
> 23969 NE State Rte 3
> Suite G101
> Belfair, Wa 98528
>
> June 5th 2006
>
>
> (Tellings / Ohio)
>
> In Ohio we just received word that the Sixth District Court of appeals
> which ruled BSL is unconstitutional denied Toledo's motion to certify a
> conflict of interest between the Tellings case and old constitutional
> challenges that took place in Ohio where they found BSL to be
> constitutional.
> That means the Sixth District Court of Appeals is standing strong on their
> ruling and are making it clear there is no conflict and that their opinion
> is stronger than all other cases in Ohio !!!!!!!
>
> The Ohio Supreme Court has not decided if they are going to hear the
> Tellings case and ACF is ready to file a strong motion to lift a temporary
> stay granted by the Supreme Court while they make their decision.
>
>
>
> RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
>
> ACF called Riverside County and we forwarded the email below to them:
>
>
> From: leigslation2006@hotmail.com
> xxxxxxxxxxx
> xxxxxxxxxx
>>From American Canine Foundation (ACF)
> June 5, 2006
>
>
> To the Riverside Board of Supervisors:
>
> California in the 2005 session passed SB861 which allows local governments
> the rights to mandatory spay and neuter laws with breeding restrictions.
> SB861 was passed on flawed data and it infringes on responsible dog owners
> rights. Mandatory breeding laws do not protect the public and ACF has
> attached a copy of an amended federal complaint naming LA County for your
> information.
>
> In Calfornia statistics show that the populations in shelters has dropped
> by 50% in the last 6 years and adoption has increased while dangerous dog
> impounds has decreased 65%
>
> ACF will amend other counties and city's who choose to adopt laws that
> require mandatory spay and neuter with breeding restrictions that violate
> dog owners rights.
>
> Sincerely,
> Cindy McCammon
> American Canine Foundation
> 360 277 3647