Judy
04-22-2006, 03:26 PM
Permission to crosspost
Here is the entire ordinance effective May 10th. NOTE: kennel requirements do not apply to foster homes IF animals are kept no longer than 60 days. NOTE: Screening for yard required so the public does not see animals "copulating". Is this dogs/cats only? It gets worse.
One breeding permit per animal in a 12-month period. If you *cause* a breeding whether or not the animal is in your name – you are a breeder under this ordinance. Breeder permits must be obtained from animal control for all dog/cat breeding within five business days *after* the birth of the litter. Is this pure idiocy? or clever enough to lead to "well this doesn't work so let's ban breeding altogether".
Per my conversation today with county officials, there are no plans to revise the county ordinance; this ordinance is for Fayetteville only. The Animal Control Advisory Board meets again May 1st. This ordinance has passed, but could be modified before actually going into effect. Certainly does not need to become county-wide. Please take time to write a letter to express your views on this terrible ordinance. Why isn’t their leash law being enforced; it would solve part of their problem. What public education is in place? What offers of low cost or discounted spay neuter do they provide? Why limit rescue foster homes to 60 days? Where is it stated in North Carolina law is animal “copulation” needs to be hidden from public view to give Fayetteville a right to force people to build expensive fences? How many animals will be dumped into shelters because it is cheaper than spending thousands of dollars for screening?
What plans do they have to implement this insanity? Passing such a restrictive law with no ability to enforce it makes no sense, makes the county look ineffective, makes a case to pass even worse laws that do not get to the root of the problem.
Friends, if we do not begin to keep a close eye on our local governments, we will all be in serious trouble trying to continue our animal hobbies. Government passes bad laws all the time because they do not investigate other options or it is easier to say “do it this way and make it so”.
CONTACT INFO:
COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairman Billy King bking@co.cumberland.nc.us (http://us.f311.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=bking@co.cumberland.nc.us)
Vice Chairman Kenneth Edge kedge@co.cumberland.nc.us (http://us.f311.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=kedge@co.cumberland.nc.us)
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
Mayor Anthony G. Chavonne
mayor@ci.fay.nc.us (http://us.f311.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=mayor@ci.fay.nc.us)
Council Members http://www.cityoffayetteville.org/council/council_members.htm (http://www.cityoffayetteville.org/council/council_members.htm)
Per the City Council meeting minutes:
- limits on numbers are not out of the realm of possibility; the Animal Control Board is supposed to evaluate this
- 11/14/05 minutes
Report from Ad Hoc Animal Control Committee.
Council Member Gonzalez, Chairperson, presented this item and reviewed the minutes of the Committee, which included the number of calls, the cost of micro chipping, and the costs for a privilege license. She stated the main concerns were regulating the number of animals, backyard breeding, providing trained officers that would be accountable to the City, micro chipping, fee schedules, and animals running loose.
- 2/13/06 minutes
Animal Control Ad Hoc Committee: Council Member Juanita Gonzalez, Chairperson
Council Member Gonzalez, Chairperson, presented this item and stated they had discussed prohibiting the sale of live animals along the roadways and the recommendation was adoption of the ordinance.
Council Member Williams inquired if this ordinance would prohibit property owners from selling on private property. City Attorney Karen McDonald responded it would not prohibit a person selling animals on private property.
Council Member Gonzalez invited Council’s feedback on whether Council would want to prohibit backyard breeding all together or control it.
A brief discussion ensued on whether they could totally prohibit someone from breeding animals on their private property.
- Fayetteville online quote:
"Councilwoman Juanita Gonzalez, who chairs the ad-hoc committee, promises that “This is just the first phase.” Upcoming committee meetings will devise tougher regulations for vicious dogs and will consider new animal-control fees. "
The full ordinance is below.
Here is the entire ordinance effective May 10th. NOTE: kennel requirements do not apply to foster homes IF animals are kept no longer than 60 days. NOTE: Screening for yard required so the public does not see animals "copulating". Is this dogs/cats only? It gets worse.
One breeding permit per animal in a 12-month period. If you *cause* a breeding whether or not the animal is in your name – you are a breeder under this ordinance. Breeder permits must be obtained from animal control for all dog/cat breeding within five business days *after* the birth of the litter. Is this pure idiocy? or clever enough to lead to "well this doesn't work so let's ban breeding altogether".
Per my conversation today with county officials, there are no plans to revise the county ordinance; this ordinance is for Fayetteville only. The Animal Control Advisory Board meets again May 1st. This ordinance has passed, but could be modified before actually going into effect. Certainly does not need to become county-wide. Please take time to write a letter to express your views on this terrible ordinance. Why isn’t their leash law being enforced; it would solve part of their problem. What public education is in place? What offers of low cost or discounted spay neuter do they provide? Why limit rescue foster homes to 60 days? Where is it stated in North Carolina law is animal “copulation” needs to be hidden from public view to give Fayetteville a right to force people to build expensive fences? How many animals will be dumped into shelters because it is cheaper than spending thousands of dollars for screening?
What plans do they have to implement this insanity? Passing such a restrictive law with no ability to enforce it makes no sense, makes the county look ineffective, makes a case to pass even worse laws that do not get to the root of the problem.
Friends, if we do not begin to keep a close eye on our local governments, we will all be in serious trouble trying to continue our animal hobbies. Government passes bad laws all the time because they do not investigate other options or it is easier to say “do it this way and make it so”.
CONTACT INFO:
COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairman Billy King bking@co.cumberland.nc.us (http://us.f311.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=bking@co.cumberland.nc.us)
Vice Chairman Kenneth Edge kedge@co.cumberland.nc.us (http://us.f311.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=kedge@co.cumberland.nc.us)
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
Mayor Anthony G. Chavonne
mayor@ci.fay.nc.us (http://us.f311.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=mayor@ci.fay.nc.us)
Council Members http://www.cityoffayetteville.org/council/council_members.htm (http://www.cityoffayetteville.org/council/council_members.htm)
Per the City Council meeting minutes:
- limits on numbers are not out of the realm of possibility; the Animal Control Board is supposed to evaluate this
- 11/14/05 minutes
Report from Ad Hoc Animal Control Committee.
Council Member Gonzalez, Chairperson, presented this item and reviewed the minutes of the Committee, which included the number of calls, the cost of micro chipping, and the costs for a privilege license. She stated the main concerns were regulating the number of animals, backyard breeding, providing trained officers that would be accountable to the City, micro chipping, fee schedules, and animals running loose.
- 2/13/06 minutes
Animal Control Ad Hoc Committee: Council Member Juanita Gonzalez, Chairperson
Council Member Gonzalez, Chairperson, presented this item and stated they had discussed prohibiting the sale of live animals along the roadways and the recommendation was adoption of the ordinance.
Council Member Williams inquired if this ordinance would prohibit property owners from selling on private property. City Attorney Karen McDonald responded it would not prohibit a person selling animals on private property.
Council Member Gonzalez invited Council’s feedback on whether Council would want to prohibit backyard breeding all together or control it.
A brief discussion ensued on whether they could totally prohibit someone from breeding animals on their private property.
- Fayetteville online quote:
"Councilwoman Juanita Gonzalez, who chairs the ad-hoc committee, promises that “This is just the first phase.” Upcoming committee meetings will devise tougher regulations for vicious dogs and will consider new animal-control fees. "
The full ordinance is below.